<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"?><oembed><version><![CDATA[1.0]]></version><provider_name><![CDATA[The Mitrailleuse]]></provider_name><provider_url><![CDATA[http://mitrailleuse.net]]></provider_url><author_name><![CDATA[J. Arthur Bloom]]></author_name><author_url><![CDATA[https://mitrailleuse.net/author/jarthurbloom/]]></author_url><title><![CDATA[The problem with TNR&#8217;s Pope Francis cover&nbsp;story]]></title><type><![CDATA[link]]></type><html><![CDATA[<p>Here&#8217;s a very long <a href="http://dailycaller.com/2015/03/12/did-the-new-new-republic-even-fact-check-its-cover-story-on-pope-francis/">piece</a> at the Daily Caller disputing points factual and theological:</p>
<blockquote><p>As a “vertically integrated digital media company,” the <a href="http://mashable.com/2015/03/02/new-republic-fund-parsely/">investment fund</a> known as the <i>New Republic </i>still produces dead-tree editions to keep up appearances. Once the flagship magazine of American liberals — the white ones, anyway — it also must keep up appearances in an ideological sense despite the billionaire CEO Chris Hughes, the spouse of a failed Democratic congressional candidate, taking the company in a more capitalistic direction. For example, the <a href="http://www.newrepublic.com/article/121168/pope-francis-conservatives-battle-us-catholic-churchs-future">cover story</a> in this month’s issue is a tissue of misrepresentations by a self-styled Christian socialist about conservative and traditional Catholics.</p></blockquote>
<p>Read the whole thing <a href="http://dailycaller.com/2015/03/12/did-the-new-new-republic-even-fact-check-its-cover-story-on-pope-francis/">here</a>.</p>
]]></html></oembed>