<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"?><oembed><version><![CDATA[1.0]]></version><provider_name><![CDATA[amphoteros]]></provider_name><provider_url><![CDATA[http://amphoteros.com]]></provider_url><author_name><![CDATA[ayudin2013]]></author_name><author_url><![CDATA[https://amphoteros.com/author/ayudin2013/]]></author_url><title><![CDATA[Ugly cousins: mystery molecules popping up&nbsp;everywhere]]></title><type><![CDATA[link]]></type><html><![CDATA[<p>Let me share a frustration I never thought was possible: you look at a co-crystal structure of a protein with a small molecule bound to it and you have no idea what this small molecule is. That&#8217;s right. I have to admit that this is a fairly awkward feeling for someone who has a lab that makes small molecules. My students rely on X-ray crystallography for structure determination in our day-to-day endeavours. However, we use direct methods in organic chemistry and, sure enough, when you have a molecule whose structure is solved at 0.6 Angstrom resolution, life is good and you can rely 100% on the data when it tells you what a given molecule is. Protein structures are way more complex, yet rely on a MODEL when you try to solve the structure. If you have a 2.4 Angstrom resolution structure and you see electron density corresponding to a small molecule bound to the protein, good luck finding out what this molecule is unless you already know it or suspect what it might be! Isn&#8217;t it frustrating?</p>
<p>A case in point is shown below, which is our day to day struggle at the moment&#8230; Right in the center of the picture you see a banana-like electron density which is not part of the protein. You do see a (presumed) structure and it is shown as a model. But don&#8217;t be fooled, this is far from reality. We know that it ain&#8217;t real since anomalous scattering tells us that there are no S atoms, despite the SO3- group clearly modelled in the structure shown. We are trying to find out what the density belongs to and are still in the dark. I never thought (perhaps naively) that this could be the case, but it is true&#8230; Protein crystallography is for proteins and small molecules appear to be the proteins&#8217; ugly cousins! We are trying to use all sorts of tools, including non-denaturing MS but we can&#8217;t seem to zero in on the right structure (yet). Stay tuned. Incidentally, this is a protein I crystallized with Elena not long ago. I can&#8217;t disclose the name of it yet, sorry.</p>
<p><a href="https://amphoteros.files.wordpress.com/2013/08/density.jpg"><img class="size-full wp-image aligncenter" id="i-356" alt="Image" src="https://amphoteros.files.wordpress.com/2013/08/density.jpg?w=487" srcset="https://amphoteros.files.wordpress.com/2013/08/density.jpg?w=487 487w, https://amphoteros.files.wordpress.com/2013/08/density.jpg?w=974 974w, https://amphoteros.files.wordpress.com/2013/08/density.jpg?w=150 150w, https://amphoteros.files.wordpress.com/2013/08/density.jpg?w=300 300w, https://amphoteros.files.wordpress.com/2013/08/density.jpg?w=768 768w" sizes="(max-width: 487px) 100vw, 487px" /></a></p>
<p>I love this sabbatical!</p>
]]></html><thumbnail_url><![CDATA[https://i1.wp.com/amphoteros.files.wordpress.com/2013/08/density.jpg?fit=440%2C330]]></thumbnail_url><thumbnail_width><![CDATA[440]]></thumbnail_width><thumbnail_height><![CDATA[237]]></thumbnail_height></oembed>