<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"?><oembed><version><![CDATA[1.0]]></version><provider_name><![CDATA[amphoteros]]></provider_name><provider_url><![CDATA[http://amphoteros.com]]></provider_url><author_name><![CDATA[ayudin2013]]></author_name><author_url><![CDATA[https://amphoteros.com/author/ayudin2013/]]></author_url><title><![CDATA[Flexible poses of&nbsp;macrocycles]]></title><type><![CDATA[link]]></type><html><![CDATA[<p>Earlier today I set up 1056 crystallizations of the macrocycles my students Joanne and Serge gave me. We are keeping our fingers crossed that we will get something cool in these experiments&#8230;</p>
<p>As long as we are on the subject of macrocycles, I have to admit that they are really in the league of their own in terms of the insane conformational space they sample. There is no wonder researchers are having a tough time modelling them in the context of biological receptors. People only say macrocycles are rigid &#8211; they are certainly not! Here is a very cool case that shows how difficult it is to navigate through the conformational space of a macrocycle. Elena showed me this paper by Waugh and colleagues:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022283605009745" rel="nofollow">http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022283605009745</a></p>
<p>This work describes a macrocyclic SH2 domain inhibitor shown below:</p>
<p><a href="https://amphoteros.files.wordpress.com/2013/08/sh2.jpg"><img class="size-full wp-image aligncenter" id="i-382" alt="Image" src="https://amphoteros.files.wordpress.com/2013/08/sh2.jpg?w=487" srcset="https://amphoteros.files.wordpress.com/2013/08/sh2.jpg?w=487 487w, https://amphoteros.files.wordpress.com/2013/08/sh2.jpg?w=974 974w, https://amphoteros.files.wordpress.com/2013/08/sh2.jpg?w=150 150w, https://amphoteros.files.wordpress.com/2013/08/sh2.jpg?w=300 300w, https://amphoteros.files.wordpress.com/2013/08/sh2.jpg?w=768 768w" sizes="(max-width: 487px) 100vw, 487px" /></a></p>
<p>Here is a quote from the paper: &#8220;The sodium salt of S1s was dissolved in water and added to the highly pure Grb2 SH2 domain at 1.5:1 ligand to protein molar ratio. The complex was heated at 50 C for 10 min … before crystallization experiments were set up”. Are you kidding me? If you do not cook this thing up together with its target protein, it just won&#8217;t find the right pose. Big-time food for though here&#8230;</p>
<p>I am in San Francisco now (in Palo Alto to be exact). Tomorrow I am at Anacor and I will blog about my visit.</p>
]]></html><thumbnail_url><![CDATA[https://i0.wp.com/amphoteros.files.wordpress.com/2013/08/sh2.jpg?fit=440%2C330]]></thumbnail_url><thumbnail_width><![CDATA[402]]></thumbnail_width><thumbnail_height><![CDATA[330]]></thumbnail_height></oembed>