<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"?><oembed><version><![CDATA[1.0]]></version><provider_name><![CDATA[amphoteros]]></provider_name><provider_url><![CDATA[http://amphoteros.com]]></provider_url><author_name><![CDATA[ayudin2013]]></author_name><author_url><![CDATA[https://amphoteros.com/author/ayudin2013/]]></author_url><title><![CDATA[Good old condensation&nbsp;reactions]]></title><type><![CDATA[link]]></type><html><![CDATA[<p>We have finished our grant proposal and managed to submit it on time. As I mentioned yesterday, this grant deals with the chemistry of boron-containing heterocycles and their biological properties as serine protease inhibitors. A preliminary account of our borocycle chemistry driven by boryl isocyanides, appeared earlier this summer (see my July 21 post). Besides what I think is an interesting structure-driven means to optimizing the cellular permeability and activity of these molecules, we have an approach to place boron in heterocycles using simple condensation reactions. As I was thinking about condensation chemistry, I recalled to mind some of my favorite papers from the past. A lot has been said about enamines in recent years, and for a good reason. Originally developed by Stork, enamines are the engine of many innovative synthetic approaches, including organocatalysis. Yet, if you think about the parent &#8220;NH2&#8221; enamine, it has remained a curiosity due to its highly unstable nature. Back in 2001, Novak and colleagues published a thought-provoking paper that trapped these species in a radical-mediated polymerization. This publication has always been one of my all-time favorite papers. The way to generate the parent enamine shown below is not through condensation (can’t really use thermodynamically controlled reactions). Instead, the authors used transition metal-catalyzed isomerization. Afterwards, they cleverly co-polymerized the enamine under radical  conditions before it had a chance to undergo tautomerization. To me, this is super cool.</p>
<p style="text-align:center;"><a href="https://amphoteros.files.wordpress.com/2013/10/nnn.jpg"><img class="size-full wp-image aligncenter" id="i-756" alt="Image" src="https://amphoteros.files.wordpress.com/2013/10/nnn.jpg?w=487" srcset="https://amphoteros.files.wordpress.com/2013/10/nnn.jpg?w=487 487w, https://amphoteros.files.wordpress.com/2013/10/nnn.jpg?w=974 974w, https://amphoteros.files.wordpress.com/2013/10/nnn.jpg?w=150 150w, https://amphoteros.files.wordpress.com/2013/10/nnn.jpg?w=300 300w, https://amphoteros.files.wordpress.com/2013/10/nnn.jpg?w=768 768w" sizes="(max-width: 487px) 100vw, 487px" /></a><a href="http://pubs.acs.org/doi/pdf/10.1021/ja011609i" rel="nofollow">http://pubs.acs.org/doi/pdf/10.1021/ja011609i</a></p>
<p style="text-align:left;">P.S. I am sure my lab might notice the wording &#8220;simple enamines&#8221; in the paper title&#8230;</p>
]]></html><thumbnail_url><![CDATA[https://i2.wp.com/amphoteros.files.wordpress.com/2013/10/nnn.jpg?fit=440%2C330]]></thumbnail_url><thumbnail_width><![CDATA[439]]></thumbnail_width><thumbnail_height><![CDATA[137]]></thumbnail_height></oembed>