<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"?><oembed><version><![CDATA[1.0]]></version><provider_name><![CDATA[evolutionistx]]></provider_name><provider_url><![CDATA[https://evolutionistx.wordpress.com]]></provider_url><author_name><![CDATA[evolutiontheorist]]></author_name><author_url><![CDATA[https://evolutionistx.wordpress.com/author/evolutiontheorist/]]></author_url><title><![CDATA[Liberals and Conservatives have Stopped Talking to Each&nbsp;Other]]></title><type><![CDATA[link]]></type><html><![CDATA[<p>They aren&#8217;t talking to each other; they aren&#8217;t even talking about the same stuff anymore.</p>
<p>I normally hang out with liberals, but this past weekend I spent around some of the more traditionally conservative members of my extended family. Since I spend a fair amount of time critiquing liberal ideas, you might think we&#8217;d have a ton to discuss, but no. The things I&#8217;m concerned about and the things they&#8217;re concerned about are totally different things.</p>
<p>Think about it: how often do you hear liberals make an impassioned defense of Obama&#8217;s actions in Benghazi?</p>
<p>Personally, never. I&#8217;ve never heard liberals discuss Benghazi at all. The only time I&#8217;ve heard the word cross their lips, (or keyboards,) is in the context of, &#8220;Oh god, my conservative relatives ae going to rattle on endlessly about Benghazi at Thanksgiving dinner.&#8221; It might as well be a hemorrhoid treatment for all liberals want to talk about it.</p>
<p>Now take the conservative side. When&#8217;s the last time you heard your conservative relatives talking about &#8220;white privilege&#8221;?</p>
<p>Probably never.</p>
<p>Some stuff makes it into both communities&#8211;riots, for example&#8211;but a ton of political debate, discussion, philosophy, development, etc., is going on in total isolation from the other side.</p>
<p>The reason, quite simply, is <em>the internet</em>.</p>
<p>Once upon a time, there was no internet. Everyone watched TV and/or read newspapers, and even if you hated Fox News or MSNBC, you probably still encountered it occasionally or knew people who watched it. In other words, there were only a few news sources, and chances were good that you were watching/reading them.</p>
<p>Then came the internet. Many young people today get most of their news/political discussion from internet sources like Tumblr and Facebook. Many of them do not take a newspaper or watch the evening news, and neither do the majority of people they know.</p>
<p>Older people still get their news primarily from TV and newspapers. (One older relative claimed to spend $190 a month just so he could watch Fox News&#8211;a news source he very adamantly vowed to never give up.)</p>
<p>So young people progress ever leftward, largely oblivious to what old people are thinking and talking about. And old people, in their own information-bubble, have no idea what young people are thinking and talking about.</p>
<p>Conservatism tends to be pretty bad at making coherent counter-arguments to liberalism, (mostly, I think, because conservatives tend to operate on an emotional basis of &#8220;I like it like this because I&#8217;m used to it,&#8221; rather than on rational arguments,) but if the two sides aren&#8217;t even talking, the chances of getting the two sides to agree on anything or debate their way to a rational consensus seems even less likely than usual.</p>
<p>I think it likely that some new form of conservatism may spawn from the depths of the internet.</p>
]]></html></oembed>