<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"?><oembed><version><![CDATA[1.0]]></version><provider_name><![CDATA[evolutionistx]]></provider_name><provider_url><![CDATA[https://evolutionistx.wordpress.com]]></provider_url><author_name><![CDATA[evolutiontheorist]]></author_name><author_url><![CDATA[https://evolutionistx.wordpress.com/author/evolutiontheorist/]]></author_url><title><![CDATA[Elections chose for ability to win&nbsp;Elections]]></title><type><![CDATA[link]]></type><html><![CDATA[<p>So I was reading about the building of the trans-continental railroad (and Napoleon) and wondering to myself why so many of our politicians seem utterly lacking in leadership skills like actual competence or ability to get things done.</p>
<p>Napoleon rose to the top of the French Military (as far as I know,) by winning battles. Railroad tycoons got to be railroad tycoons by building railroads. Steve Jobs got to be famous by &#8230; innovating in product design? Thomas Edison invented the lightbulb and understood the necessity of building a universal power grid so he could sell them to everyone.</p>
<p>George Washington was a leader, not a politician. He got into office because everyone involved decided, based on the job he&#8217;d done leading the army during the Revolutionary War, that he&#8217;d be a good national leader in peacetime.</p>
<p>But systems have unexpected consequences&#8211;you get what you select for, not what you intend to select for. The founders wanted voters to simply come to a rational agreement about who would be the country&#8217;s best leader. Since then, we have accrued dozens of layers of complications&#8211;political parties and primary votes; super pacs and campaign ads. I have no doubt the founders would have despised it all.</p>
<p>In our case, the electoral system now selects for people who are good at winning elections.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
]]></html></oembed>