<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"?><oembed><version><![CDATA[1.0]]></version><provider_name><![CDATA[Azimuth]]></provider_name><provider_url><![CDATA[https://johncarlosbaez.wordpress.com]]></provider_url><author_name><![CDATA[John Baez]]></author_name><author_url><![CDATA[https://johncarlosbaez.wordpress.com/author/johncarlosbaez/]]></author_url><title><![CDATA[The Education of a&nbsp;Scientist]]></title><type><![CDATA[link]]></type><html><![CDATA[<p>Why are scientists like me getting so worked up over Elsevier and other journal publishers? It must seem strange from the outside. This cartoon explains it very clearly. It&#8217;s hilarious&#8212;except that it&#8217;s <b><i>TRUE!!!</i></b> This is why we need a revolution.</p>
<span class='embed-youtube' style='text-align:center; display: block;'><iframe class='youtube-player' type='text/html' width='560' height='315' src='https://www.youtube.com/embed/7_UAGireJpQ?version=3&#038;rel=1&#038;fs=1&#038;showsearch=0&#038;showinfo=1&#038;iv_load_policy=1&#038;wmode=transparent' frameborder='0' allowfullscreen='true'></iframe></span>
<p>(It&#8217;s true except for one small thing: in math and physics, Elsevier and Springer let us put our papers on our websites and free electronic archives&#8230; though not the final version, only the near-final draft.  This is a concession we had to fight for.)</p>
<p>What can you do? Two easy things:</p>
<p>&bull; If you&#8217;re an academic, <a href="http://thecostofknowledge.com/">add your name to the boycott of Elsevier</a>.</p>
<p>&bull; If you&#8217;re a US citizen, <a href="https://wwws.whitehouse.gov/petitions/!/petition/strengthen-public-access-publicly-funded-research-and-support-federal-research-public-access-act/jF4mxRc4">sign this White House petition before March 9</a>. </p>
<h4> Why the problem is hard </h4>
<p>Why is it so hard it is to solve the journal problem?  Here&#8217;s a quick simplified explanation for outsiders&#8212;people who don&#8217;t live in the world of university professors.</p>
<p>There are lots of open-access journals that are free to read but the author needs to pay a fee.  There are even lots that are free to read and free for the author.  Why doesn&#8217;t everyone switch to publishing in these? Lots of us have. But most haven&#8217;t. Two reasons:</p>
<p>1) These journals aren&#8217;t as &#8220;prestigious&#8221; as the journals owned by the evil Big Three publishers: Elsevier, Springer, and Wiley-Blackwell. In the last 30 years the Big Three bought most of the really &#8220;prestigious&#8221; journals &#8211; and a journal can&#8217;t become &#8220;prestigious&#8221; overnight, so while things are changing, they&#8217;re changing slowly.</p>
<p>Publishing in a &#8220;prestigious&#8221; journal helps you get hired, promoted, and get grants. &#8220;Prestige&#8221; is not a vague thing: it&#8217;s even measured numerically using something called the Impact Factor. It may be baloney, but it is collectively agreed-upon baloney. Trying to make it go away is like trying to make money go away: people would not know what to do without it.</p>
<p>2) It&#8217;s not the professors who pay the outrageous subscription fees for journals &#8211; it&#8217;s the university libraries. So nothing instantly punishes the professors for publishing in &#8220;prestigious&#8221; but highly expensive journals, except the nasty rules about resharing journal articles, which however are invisible if you live in a world of professors where everyone has library access!</p>
<p>So, the problem is hard to solve.  The fight will be hard. </p>
<p>But we&#8217;ll win anyway, because the current situation is just too outrageous to tolerate.  We have strategies and we&#8217;re pursuing lots of them.  You can help by doing those two easy things.</p>
]]></html></oembed>