<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"?><oembed><version><![CDATA[1.0]]></version><provider_name><![CDATA[Azimuth]]></provider_name><provider_url><![CDATA[https://johncarlosbaez.wordpress.com]]></provider_url><author_name><![CDATA[John Baez]]></author_name><author_url><![CDATA[https://johncarlosbaez.wordpress.com/author/johncarlosbaez/]]></author_url><title><![CDATA[A Bet Concerning Neutrinos (Part&nbsp;5)]]></title><type><![CDATA[link]]></type><html><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s a little-known spinoff of Heisenberg&#8217;s uncertainty principle.  When you accurately measure the velocity of neutrinos, they can turn into <i>ham!</i>  </p>
<div align="center"><img width="450" src="https://i2.wp.com/math.ucr.edu/home/baez/ham.jpg" /></div>
<p>I observed this myself.  It came in the mail along with some sausages, bacon, and peach and blueberry syrup.  They&#8217;re from <a href="https://plus.google.com/u/0/116337470434095717442/posts">Heather Vandagriff</a>.  Thanks, Heather!</p>
<p>These are the first of my winnings on <a href="https://johncarlosbaez.wordpress.com/2011/12/04/a-bet-concerning-neutrinos-part-4/">some bets</a> concerning the famous OPERA experiment that seemed to detect neutrinos going faster than light.  I bet that this experiment would be shown wrong.  Heather bet me some Tennessee ham against some nice cloth from Singapore.</p>
<p>The OPERA team announced that they&#8217;d detected faster-than-light neutrinos back in September 2011.   But later, they discovered two flaws in their experimental setup.  </p>
<p>First, a fiber optic cable wasn&#8217;t screwed in right.  This made it take about 70 nanoseconds longer than it should have for a signal from a global positioning system to the so-called &#8216;master clock&#8217;:</p>
<div align="center"><a href="http://profmattstrassler.com/articles-and-posts/particle-physics-basics/neutrinos/neutrinos-faster-than-light/opera-what-went-wrong/"><img width="450" src="https://i0.wp.com/math.ucr.edu/home/baez/OPERA_delay_cause.png" /></a></div>
<p>Since the clock got its signal <i>late</i>, the neutrinos seemed to show up <i>early</i>.  Click on the picture for a more detailed explanation.</p>
<p>On top of this, the clock was poorly calibrated!  This had a roughly opposite effect: it tended to make the neutrinos seem to show up late&#8230; but only some of the time.  However, this effect was not big enough, on average, to cancel the other mistake.</p>
<p>The OPERA team fixed these problems and repeated the experiment in May 2012. The neutrinos came in slower than light:</p>
<p>&bull; OPERA, <a href="http://arxiv.org/abs/1109.4897">Measurement of the neutrino velocity with the OPERA detector in the CNGS beam</a>, 12 July 2012.</p>
<p>Three other experiments using the same neutrino source&#8212;Borexino, ICARUS, and LVD&#8212;also got the same result!  For a more detailed post-mortem, with lots of references, see:</p>
<p>&bull; <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Faster-than-light_neutrino_anomaly">Faster-than-light neutrino anomaly</a>, Wikipedia.</p>
<p>My wife Lisa has a saying from her days in the computer business: <b>when in doubt, check the cables.</b></p>
]]></html><thumbnail_url><![CDATA[https://i2.wp.com/math.ucr.edu/home/baez/ham.jpg?fit=440%2C330]]></thumbnail_url><thumbnail_height><![CDATA[330]]></thumbnail_height><thumbnail_width><![CDATA[440]]></thumbnail_width></oembed>