<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"?><oembed><version><![CDATA[1.0]]></version><provider_name><![CDATA[Azimuth]]></provider_name><provider_url><![CDATA[https://johncarlosbaez.wordpress.com]]></provider_url><author_name><![CDATA[John Baez]]></author_name><author_url><![CDATA[https://johncarlosbaez.wordpress.com/author/johncarlosbaez/]]></author_url><title><![CDATA[What is Climate&nbsp;Change?]]></title><type><![CDATA[link]]></type><html><![CDATA[<p>Here are the slides for a 15-minute talk I&#8217;m giving on Friday for the <a href="https://johncarlosbaez.wordpress.com/2013/10/13/what-is-climate-change-and-what-to-do-about-it/">Interdisciplinary Climate Change Workshop</a> at the Balsillie School of International Affairs:</p>
<p>&bull; <a href="http://math.ucr.edu/home/baez/balsillie/balsillie_what.pdf">What is Climate Change?</a></p>
<p>This will be the first talk of the workshop.   Many participants are focused on diplomacy and economics.  None are officially biologists or ecologists.  So, I want to set the stage with a broad perspective that fits humans into the biosphere as a whole.</p>
<p>I claim that climate change is just one aspect of something bigger: a new geological epoch, the <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anthropocene">Anthropocene</a>. </p>
<div align="center"><a href="http://www.economist.com/node/18741749"><img width="450" src="https://i2.wp.com/media.economist.com/images/images-magazine/2011/05/28/bb/20110528_bbc980.gif" /></a></div>
<p>I start with evidence that human civilization is having such a big impact on the biosphere that we&#8217;re entering a new geological epoch.  </p>
<p>Then I point out what this implies.  Climate change is not an isolated &#8216;problem&#8217; of the sort routinely &#8216;solved&#8217; by existing human institutions.  It is part of a shift from the exponential growth phase of human impact on the biosphere to a new, uncharted phase. </p>
<p>In this new phase, institutions and attitudes will change dramatically, like it or not:</p>
<p>&bull; <i>Before</i> we could treat &#8216;nature&#8217; as distinct from &#8216;civilization&#8217;.  <i>Now</i>, there is no nature separate from civilization.  </p>
<p>&bull; <i>Before</i>, we might imagine &#8216;economic growth&#8217; an almost unalloyed good, with many externalities disregarded.  <i>Now</i>, many forms of growth have reached the point where they push  the biosphere toward tipping points.</p>
<p>In a separate talk I&#8217;ll say a bit about &#8216;what we can do about it&#8217;.  So, nothing about that here.  You can click on words in blue to see sources for the information. </p>
]]></html><thumbnail_url><![CDATA[https://i2.wp.com/media.economist.com/images/images-magazine/2011/05/28/bb/20110528_bbc980.gif?fit=440%2C330]]></thumbnail_url><thumbnail_height><![CDATA[206]]></thumbnail_height><thumbnail_width><![CDATA[440]]></thumbnail_width></oembed>