<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"?><oembed><version><![CDATA[1.0]]></version><provider_name><![CDATA[Azimuth]]></provider_name><provider_url><![CDATA[https://johncarlosbaez.wordpress.com]]></provider_url><author_name><![CDATA[John Baez]]></author_name><author_url><![CDATA[https://johncarlosbaez.wordpress.com/author/johncarlosbaez/]]></author_url><title><![CDATA[Who is Bankrolling the Climate Change Counter-Movement?]]></title><type><![CDATA[link]]></type><html><![CDATA[<p><img width="450" src="https://i0.wp.com/math.ucr.edu/home/baez/ecological/men_in_black.jpg" /></p>
<p>It&#8217;s mostly secret.  A <a href="http://www.drexel.edu/~/media/Files/now/pdfs/Institutionalizing%20Delay%20-%20Climatic%20Change.ashx">new refereed paper</a> by Robert Brulle of Drexel University looks into it.  </p>
<blockquote><p>
&#8220;The climate change countermovement has had a real political and ecological impact on the failure of the world to act on the issue of global warming,&#8221; said Brulle. &#8220;Like a play on Broadway, the countermovement has stars in the spotlight&#8212;often prominent contrarian scientists or conservative politicians&#8212;but behind the stars is an organizational structure of directors, script writers and producers, in the form of conservative foundations. If you want to understand what&#8217;s driving this movement, you have to look at what&#8217;s going on behind the scenes.&#8221;
</p></blockquote>
<p>So he looked, and he found this:</p>
<p>• The biggest <i>known</i> funders of organizations downplaying the importance of man-made climate change are foundations such as the <a href="http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php/Searle_Freedom_Trust">Searle Freedom Trust</a>, the <a href="http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php/John_William_Pope_Foundation">John William Pope Foundation</a>, the <a href="http://fdo.foundationcenter.org/grantmaker-profile?key=HOWA053">Howard Charitable Foundation</a> and the <a href="http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php/Sarah_Scaife_Foundation">Sarah Scaife Foundation</a>.</p>
<p>• Koch and ExxonMobil have pulled back from publicly visible funding. From 2003 to 2007, the <a href="http://www.greenpeace.org/usa/en/campaigns/global-warming-and-energy/polluterwatch/koch-industries/">Koch Affiliated Foundations</a> and the <a href="http://www.greenpeace.org/usa/en/campaigns/global-warming-and-energy/exxon-secrets/">ExxonMobil Foundation</a> were heavily involved in funding the climate change countermovement. But since 2008, they are no longer making publicly traceable contributions.</p>
<p>• Funding has shifted to pass through untraceable sources.  As traceable funding drops, the amount of funding given to the countermovement by the <a href="http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php/DonorsTrust">Donors Trust</a> has risen dramatically. Donors Trust is a donor-directed foundation whose funders cannot be traced. This one foundation now provides about 25% of all traceable foundation funding used by organizations engaged in promoting systematic denial of human-caused climate change.</p>
<p>• Most funding for denial efforts is untraceable.  Despite extensive digging, only a small part of the hundreds of millions in contributions to climate change denying organizations can be found out from public records.  A group of 91 climate change denial organizations has a total income of $900 million per year&#8212;but only $64 million in identifiable foundation support!</p>
<p>All this is from the original paper:</p>
<p>• Robert J. Brulle, <a href="http://www.drexel.edu/~/media/Files/now/pdfs/Institutionalizing%20Delay%20-%20Climatic%20Change.ashx">Institutionalizing delay: foundation funding and the creation of U.S. climate change counter-movement organizations</a>, <i>Climatic Change</i>, 2013.</p>
<p>and this summary:</p>
<p>• <a href="http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2013/12/131220154511.htm">Not just Koch brothers: new study reveals funders behind climate change denial effort</a>, <i>ScienceDaily</i>, 20 December 2013.</p>
<p>Ironically, the original paper would probably be hidden behind a paywall if someone hadn&#8217;t liberated it.  Get your copy now, while you can!</p>
<p>You can also get 120 pages of details&#8212;names and dollar amounts&#8212;here:</p>
<p>•  Robert J. Brulle, <a href="http://www.desmogblog.com/sites/beta.desmogblog.com/files/Institutionalizing%20Delay%20Supplemental%20Material.pdf">Supplementary online material</a>.</p>
<p>Here is Brulle&#8217;s pie chart of who is doing the (traceable!) funding&#8212;click to enlarge:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.desmogblog.com/sites/beta.desmogblog.com/files/Figure%201.png"><img width="450" src="https://i0.wp.com/www.desmogblog.com/sites/beta.desmogblog.com/files/Figure%201.png" /></a></p>
<p>And here is his chart of the organizations who are getting funded:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.desmogblog.com/sites/beta.desmogblog.com/files/Figure%202.png"><img width="450" src="https://i1.wp.com/www.desmogblog.com/sites/beta.desmogblog.com/files/Figure%202.png" /></a></p>
<p>Here is his graph showing the rise of Donors Trust:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.desmogblog.com/sites/beta.desmogblog.com/files/Figure%203.png"><img width="450" src="https://i1.wp.com/www.desmogblog.com/sites/beta.desmogblog.com/files/Figure%203.png" /></a></p>
<p>And here is his picture of the social network involved in climate change denial.  He calls this the <b>Climate Change Counter Movement</b>.  You really <i>need</i> to enlarge this one to see anything:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.desmogblog.com/sites/beta.desmogblog.com/files/Figure%204.png"><img width="450" src="https://i1.wp.com/www.desmogblog.com/sites/beta.desmogblog.com/files/Figure%204.png" /></a></p>
]]></html><thumbnail_url><![CDATA[https://i0.wp.com/math.ucr.edu/home/baez/ecological/men_in_black.jpg?fit=440%2C330]]></thumbnail_url><thumbnail_height><![CDATA[300]]></thumbnail_height><thumbnail_width><![CDATA[440]]></thumbnail_width></oembed>