<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"?><oembed><version><![CDATA[1.0]]></version><provider_name><![CDATA[Azimuth]]></provider_name><provider_url><![CDATA[https://johncarlosbaez.wordpress.com]]></provider_url><author_name><![CDATA[John Baez]]></author_name><author_url><![CDATA[https://johncarlosbaez.wordpress.com/author/johncarlosbaez/]]></author_url><title><![CDATA[Categories in Control &#8211; Erlangen&nbsp;Talk]]></title><type><![CDATA[link]]></type><html><![CDATA[<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><img width="450" src="https://i1.wp.com/math.ucr.edu/home/baez/diary/erlangen/erlangen_1916.jpg" /></p>
<p>I&#8217;m visiting Erlangen from now until the end of May, since my wife got a grant to do research here.  I&#8217;m trying to get a lot of papers finished.  But today I&#8217;m giving a talk in the math department of the university here, which with Germanic brevity is called the Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg.</p>
<p>You can see my slides here, or maybe even come to my talk:</p>
<p>&bull; <a href="http://math.ucr.edu/home/baez/control/control_talk_erlangen.pdf">Categories in control</a>, Thursday 6 February 2014, 16:15&#8211;18:00, Mathematics Department of the FAU, in  <a href="https://www.math.fau.de/kontakt/campus-map.html">&Uuml;bungsraum 1</a>.</p>
<p>The title is a pun.  It&#8217;s about categories in <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Control_theory"><b>control theory</b></a>, the branch of engineering that studies dynamical systems with inputs and outputs, and how to optimize their behavior.</p>
<p>Control theorists often describe these systems using <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Signal-flow_graph">signal-flow graphs</a>.  Here is a very rough schematic signal-flow graph, describing the all-important concept of a &#8216;feedback loop&#8217;:</p>
<div align="center"><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Signal-flow_graph"><img width="400" src="https://i2.wp.com/upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/2/24/Feedback_loop_with_descriptions.svg/500px-Feedback_loop_with_descriptions.svg.png" /></a></div>
<p>Here is a detailed one, describing a specific device called a servo:</p>
<p><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Signal-flow_graph#Example_4:_Position_servo_with_multi-loop_feedback"><img width="450" src="https://i1.wp.com/upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/1/10/Position_servo_and_signal_flow_graph.png/640px-Position_servo_and_signal_flow_graph.png" /></a></p>
<p>The device is shown on top, and the signal-flow graph describing its behavior is at bottom.  For details, click on the picture.</p>
<p>Now, if you have a drop of category-theorist&#8217;s blood in your veins, you&#8217;ll look at this signal-flow graph and think <i>my god, that&#8217;s a string diagram for a morphism in a monoidal category!</i></p>
<p>And you&#8217;d be right.  But if you want to learn what that means, and why it matters, <a href="http://math.ucr.edu/home/baez/control/control_talk_erlangen.pdf">read my talk slides!</a></p>
<p>The slides should make sense if you&#8217;re a mathematician, but maybe not otherwise.  So, here&#8217;s the executive summary.  The same sort of super-abstract math that handles things like Feynman diagrams:</p>
<div align="center"><img width="350" src="https://i2.wp.com/math.ucr.edu/home/baez/networks/feynman_diagram_realistic.png" /></div>
<p>also handles signal-flow graphs.  The details are different in important and fascinating ways, and this is what I&#8217;m mainly concerned with.  But we now understand how signal-flow graphs fit into the general theory of networks.  This means we can proceed to use modern math to study them&#8212;and their relation to other kinds of networks, like electrical circuit diagrams:</p>
<p><img width="450" src="https://i1.wp.com/math.ucr.edu/home/baez/networks/electronics_circuit_diagram.jpg" /></p>
<h3> More talks </h3>
<p>Thanks to the <a href="http://www.azimuthproject.org/azimuth/show/HomePage">Azimuth Project</a> team, my graduate students and many other folks, the <a href="http://math.ucr.edu/home/baez/networks/networks_1.html">dream of network theory as a step toward &#8216;green mathematics&#8217;</a> seems to be coming true!  There&#8217;s a vast amount left to be done, so I&#8217;d have trouble convincing a skeptic, but I feel the project has turned a corner.  I now feel in my bones that it&#8217;s going to work: we&#8217;ll eventually develop a language for biology and ecology based in part on category theory.</p>
<p>So, I think it&#8217;s a good time to explain all the various aspects of this project that have been cooking away&#8212;some quite visibly, but others on secret back burners:</p>
<p>&bull; Jacob Biamonte and I have written a book on <a href="http://math.ucr.edu/home/baez/stoch_stable.pdf">Petri nets and chemical reaction networks</a>.  You may have seen parts of this <a href="http://math.ucr.edu/home/baez/networks/">on the blog</a>.  We started this project at the Centre for Quantum Technologies, but now he&#8217;s working at the Institute for Scientific Interchange, in Turin&#8212;and collaborating with people there on various aspects of network theory.</p>
<p>&bull; Brendan Fong is working with me on <a href="http://math.ucr.edu/home/baez/Brendan_Fong_Transfer_Report.pdf">electrical circuits</a>.  You may know him for his posts here on chemical reaction networks.  He&#8217;s now a grad student in computer science at Oxford.</p>
<p>&bull;  Jason Erbele, a math grad student at U.C. Riverside, is working with me on control theory.  This work is the main topic of my talk&#8212;but I also sketch how it ties together with what Brendan is doing.  There&#8217;s a lot more to say here.</p>
<p>&bull; Tobias Fritz, a postdoc at the Perimeter Institute, is working with me on category-theoretic aspects of information theory.  We published a <a href="https://johncarlosbaez.wordpress.com/2011/06/02/a-characterization-of-entropy/">paper on entropy</a> with Tom Leinster, and we&#8217;ve got a followup on relative entropy that&#8217;s almost done. I should be working on it <i>right this instant!</i>  <img src="https://i0.wp.com/math.ucr.edu/home/baez/emoticons/uhh.gif" />  But for now, read the series of posts here on Azimuth: <a href="https://johncarlosbaez.wordpress.com/2013/06/20/relative-entropy-part-1/">Relative Entropy Part 1</a>, <a href="https://johncarlosbaez.wordpress.com/2013/07/02/relative-entropy-part-2/">Part 2</a> and <a href="https://johncarlosbaez.wordpress.com/2013/12/25/relative-entropy-part-3/">Part 3</a>.</p>
<p>&bull; Brendan Fong has also done some great work on <a href="http://arxiv.org/abs/1301.6201">Bayesian networks</a>, using ideas that connect nicely to what Tobias and I are doing.</p>
<p>&bull; Tu Pham and Franciscus Rebro are working on the math that underlies all these projects: bicategories of spans.</p>
<p>The computer science department at Oxford is a great place for category theory and diagrammatic reasoning, thanks to the presence of Samson Abramsky, Bob Coecke and others.  I&#8217;m going to visit them from February 21 to March 14.  It seems like a good time to give a series of talks on this stuff.   So, stay tuned!  I&#8217;ll try to make slides available here.</p>
]]></html><thumbnail_url><![CDATA[https://i1.wp.com/math.ucr.edu/home/baez/diary/erlangen/erlangen_1916.jpg?fit=440%2C330]]></thumbnail_url><thumbnail_height><![CDATA[277]]></thumbnail_height><thumbnail_width><![CDATA[440]]></thumbnail_width></oembed>