<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"?><oembed><version><![CDATA[1.0]]></version><provider_name><![CDATA[The Dish]]></provider_name><provider_url><![CDATA[http://dish.andrewsullivan.com]]></provider_url><author_name><![CDATA[Andrew Sullivan]]></author_name><author_url><![CDATA[https://dish.andrewsullivan.com/author/sullydish/]]></author_url><title><![CDATA[PURITANISM ALERT]]></title><type><![CDATA[link]]></type><html><![CDATA[<p>Marjorie Williams <a HREF="http://washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A2379-2001Apr10.html" TARGET="NEW">comes out</a> bravely against women smoking in today&#8217;s Washington Post. Or, more accurately, she berates feminist organizations for not joining the war against tobacco companies. But why on earth should they? No-one alive today is unaware of the risks of smoking. If women want to smoke, why should feminist organizations try to stop them? Isn&#8217;t feminism about choice and isn&#8217;t smoking a choice? Williams even berates the cigarette companies for helping finance a whole array of feminist groups and mocks Philip Morris for funding programs to help battered women. That&#8217;ll teach them to do something that actually, tangibly benefits women. As usual with nanny-liberals (and some nanny-conservatives), Williams&#8217; main worry is that women cannot resist the lures of advertizing. But this argument infantilizes women and teenage girls even further. They&#8217;re not pawns of ads. They&#8217;re women deciding to take their own risks and live their own lives. It says something about what has happened to feminism that this is something we&#8217;re now supposed to regret rather than celebrate.</p>
]]></html></oembed>