<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"?><oembed><version><![CDATA[1.0]]></version><provider_name><![CDATA[The Dish]]></provider_name><provider_url><![CDATA[http://dish.andrewsullivan.com]]></provider_url><author_name><![CDATA[Andrew Sullivan]]></author_name><author_url><![CDATA[https://dish.andrewsullivan.com/author/sullydish/]]></author_url><title><![CDATA[IS THE MCCAIN TRAIN&nbsp;SLOWING?]]></title><type><![CDATA[link]]></type><html><![CDATA[<p>Smart little <a HREF="http://hotlinescoop.com/web/content/columns/talkingheads/" TARGET="NEW">piece</a> by Vaughn Ververs, editor of the Hotline, Washington&#8217;s favorite addiction. He points out that John McCain&#8217;s interview in Rolling Stone, where McCain said he&#8217;d have accepted the vice-presidential nod if Bush had asked him, got barely any media buzz. (Ververs&#8217; mention was the first I&#8217;d heard of it.) Not surprising, I&#8217;d say. With campaign finance reform apparently inevitable and the tax cut imminent, the Bush-McCain rivalry stories have little wind behind them. Then there&#8217;s the Republican maverick niche, which has now been adopted by the craggy Luftmensch Jeffords. For my part, I always felt that McCain was a party man, and not prone to Jeffords-like shenanigans. Look how he played along after he lost the nomination to Bush. And look how he hasn&#8217;t had a cow over the tax cut. (McCain likes tax-cuts. He&#8217;s a Republican.) There&#8217;s still the hideously named Patients&#8217; Bill of Rights, which McCain could exploit. But my best bet is that McCain is biding his time for a while. Which to my mind is the smartest thing for him to do.</p>
<p><span style="color:#7c7ca6;font-weight:bold;">HAZE IN WASHINGTON:</span> Bummer of a day. Woke up with a fever and a voice that sounded like a cross between Bob Dole and Diane Rehm. Turns out I have bronchitis. What to do but slump with the beagle and try and read the latest Philip Roth. I don&#8217;t know of any writer who does as well with sex. Somehow he manages to make it faintly unsavory and yet ennobling. It&#8217;s also so refreshing to read a man who writes so easily about his sexual attraction for women, especially young women, without any of the usual p.c. cant. Good practice for my interview with Penthouse tomorrow. (It&#8217;s on politics, mercifully.) The only problem is that if you&#8217;re actually sick, reading is hard. I knew I was desperate when I found myself watching the evening news for the first time in months. What dreck. The actual information you get from Rather-Jennings-Brokaw is somewhat less than a couple of pages of clich&eacute;-ridden type, filled with stock video images. What&#8217;s the point? Jennings was reduced to announcing that tomorrow they&#8217;ll have a special feature on gadgets for retirees. It&#8217;ll make a nice interlude between the ads for incontinence pads and Maalox. And they take themselves soooo seriously. </p>
<p><span style="color:#7c7ca6;font-weight:bold;">HOME NEWS:</span> You may have noticed the link to C-SPAN&#8217;s RealPlayer video of my Stanford speech. So many of you asked for it that we just put it up. Good luck with the download. Sorry, there&#8217;s no transcript. I make it up as I go along. But most of the ideas are developed at length in <a HREF="http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/0679746145/ref=sim_books/103-9864093-4099001" TARGET="NEW">Virtually Normal</a>.</p>
]]></html></oembed>