<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"?><oembed><version><![CDATA[1.0]]></version><provider_name><![CDATA[The Dish]]></provider_name><provider_url><![CDATA[http://dish.andrewsullivan.com]]></provider_url><author_name><![CDATA[Andrew Sullivan]]></author_name><author_url><![CDATA[https://dish.andrewsullivan.com/author/sullydish/]]></author_url><title><![CDATA[CONDIT NEWS NETWORK]]></title><type><![CDATA[link]]></type><html><![CDATA[<p>The polls (which I don&#8217;t believe) say the public is uninterested in the media&#8217;s conviction of Gary Condit for murder. But, as Andrew Kohut has pointed out, general public interest isn&#8217;t what matters. In cable news, what matters is a small sliver of the general public. The Times shows today how <a HREF="http://www.nytimes.com/2001/07/30/business/media/30LEVY.html" TARGET="NEW">successful</a> the lynch-mob has been. Paula &#8220;Psychic News Network&#8221; Zahn has ratings now that are triple what she was getting this time last year &#8211; even though they&#8217;re still only 630,000. Broadcasting psychics might be contemptible, but it works! Even better, much of the average 40 percent gain in viewers for the Chandra channels is in their ad-rich prime time. The bottom-line is that these channels are destroying someone&#8217;s reputation, privacy and career for ad dollars. Even when there is no news, even when they are reduced to psychoanalyzing Gary Condit&#8217;s facial expressions, character assassination &#8211; when the person involved cannot really respond without drowning in the sewer even further &#8211; is lucrative. How can I sum up my feelings about this kind of journalism? It makes me sick. Open message to Paula Zahn: please don&#8217;t invite me on your show again. I&#8217;m getting these psychic signals from somewhere that your journalistic standards are for sale.</p>
]]></html></oembed>