<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"?><oembed><version><![CDATA[1.0]]></version><provider_name><![CDATA[The Dish]]></provider_name><provider_url><![CDATA[http://dish.andrewsullivan.com]]></provider_url><author_name><![CDATA[Andrew Sullivan]]></author_name><author_url><![CDATA[https://dish.andrewsullivan.com/author/sullydish/]]></author_url><title><![CDATA[BRITISH FOOD, CONTINUED]]></title><type><![CDATA[link]]></type><html><![CDATA[<p>I had steamed haddock and treacle pudding last night. Up to a 34 waist again. Meanwhile, a reader sends in a literary reminiscence of British food. It&#8217;s from &#8211; who else? &#8211; Kingsley Amis, from his book, &#8220;The Folks That Live on the Hill&#8221;:</p>
<blockquote><p>[A waiter] came and laid in front of him a considerable plateful of fried slices of white bread and thick salty bacon with all the rind left on and ancillary tomatoes, as specified. Fats swam and bubbled there.<br />&#8216;My God,&#8217; said Harry with remote envy. &#8216;Butter too.&#8217;<br />Freddie shook his head as he picked up two of the three varicoloured plastic dispensers before him. &#8216;Butter, who said anything about butter? This is marge. Very hard to get these days I can assure you. . .&#8217;</p></blockquote>
<p>&#8220;Marge,&#8221; by the way, is British for margarine. At the end of the meal, Amis continues:</p>
<blockquote><p>&#8216;Do you know what I enjoyed most about that snack?&#8217;<br />&#8216;The marge?&#8217;<br />&#8216;The fact that it wasn&#8217;t beef Stroganoff or sole bonne femme or steak en croute or tripe a la mode de Caen.&#8217;<br />&#8216;I see. Aren&#8217;t you going to have some afters?&#8217;<br />They looked over at a blackboard advertising spotted dick &#8211; roly poly &#8211; syrup pudding &#8211; plum duff. . .</p></blockquote>
<p>Now, <i>that&#8217;s</i> patriotism.</p>
<p><span style="color:#7c7ca6;font-weight:bold;">CIVILIAN DEATHS: </span>Here&#8217;s the first <a href="http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&amp;cid=&amp;u=/ap/20020211/ap_on_re_as/afghan_counting_the_dead_2" target="new">solid piece</a> I&#8217;ve read about them in the Afghanistan war. Noam Chomsky probably shouldn&#8217;t read this story. The truth is always a problem for him.</p>
<p><span style="color:#7c7ca6;font-weight:bold;">LADS IN TROUBLE: </span>Here&#8217;s an interesting cultural indicator. In Britain a few years ago, the &#8220;hottest&#8221; magazines were testosterone-laden, chauvinistic men&#8217;s magazines &#8211; the kind that soon came over to the States and made Maxim a huge success story. According to <a href="http://media.guardian.co.uk/presspublishing/story/0,7495,645413,00.html" target="new">this piece</a> in the Guardian, they&#8217;re now in trouble. Big declines in circulation and advertizing. But my favorite detail, noticed by a reader, is the fact that the editor of the leading &#8220;lad&#8221; magazine, &#8220;FHM,&#8221; was unavailable for comment because he is on &#8220;paternity leave.&#8221; As my reader points out, &#8220;It&#8217;s like finding out that the editor of Cigar Aficionado is on the nicotine patch.&#8221;</p>
]]></html></oembed>