<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"?><oembed><version><![CDATA[1.0]]></version><provider_name><![CDATA[The Dish]]></provider_name><provider_url><![CDATA[http://dish.andrewsullivan.com]]></provider_url><author_name><![CDATA[Andrew Sullivan]]></author_name><author_url><![CDATA[https://dish.andrewsullivan.com/author/sullydish/]]></author_url><title><![CDATA[IN CASE YOU MISSED&nbsp;IT]]></title><type><![CDATA[link]]></type><html><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>To the editors,</p>
<p>Paul Krugman (column, July 16) says George W. Bush&#8217;s investment in the Texas Rangers entitled him to $2.3 million from the baseball team&#8217;s sale. But, Mr. Krugman writes, &#8220;his partners voluntarily gave up some of their share, and Mr. Bush received 12 percent of the proceeds &#8211; $14.9 million. So a group of businessmen, presumably with some interest in government decisions, gave a sitting governor a $12 million gift. Shouldn&#8217;t that have raised a few eyebrows?&#8221;</p>
<p>We were among Mr. Bush&#8217;s partners. In 1989, when we bought the team, Mr. Bush became the co-general partner with Edward Rose.</p>
<p>At that time, the two general partners were granted a 15 percent share (Mr. Bush received 10 percent and Mr. Rose, 5 percent) in the investment, after each investor got back his investment plus interest. This is a standard limited-partnership structure. At the time, Mr. Bush was a private citizen, not governor of Texas.</p>
<p>When we sold the team in 1998, Mr. Bush received his 10 percent share. This was not &#8220;a $12 million gift&#8221; to &#8220;a sitting governor.&#8221;</p>
<p>Mr. Bush had a good idea and the ability to make it happen. He was a dedicated manager and investor, exactly what we hope for in our business leaders.<br /> &#8211; <br />TOM A. BERNSTEIN<br />ROLAND W. BETTS<br />New York, July 22, 2002</p></blockquote>
]]></html></oembed>