<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"?><oembed><version><![CDATA[1.0]]></version><provider_name><![CDATA[The Dish]]></provider_name><provider_url><![CDATA[http://dish.andrewsullivan.com]]></provider_url><author_name><![CDATA[Andrew Sullivan]]></author_name><author_url><![CDATA[https://dish.andrewsullivan.com/author/sullydish/]]></author_url><title><![CDATA[GERMANY: &#8220;WE&#8217;RE SCARED&#8221;]]></title><type><![CDATA[link]]></type><html><![CDATA[<p>How else to interpret Joschka Fischer&#8217;s <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2003/01/20/international/middleeast/20cnd-nati.html" target="_blank">remarks</a> at the U.N. yesterday? Here&#8217;s the money quote: </p>
<blockquote><p>&#8220;We have no illusions about the brutal nature of Saddam Hussein&#8217;s regime, therefore we all demand that Baghdad implement the relevant U.N. resolutions in full. However, in addition to disastrous consequences for long-term regional stability, we also fear possible negative repercussions for the joint fight against terrorism. These are fundamental reasons for our rejection of military action.&#8221;</p></blockquote>
<p>Of course, long-term regional stability would be destroyed if Saddam gets his hands on nukes. And Fischer&#8217;s second point is simply that Germany stands ready to give in to the blackmail of threatened Islamist violence. Just like they did at the Munich Olympics. This really is a moment of truth for the United Nations. After eleven years of being defied by a ruthless and brutal regime, they&#8217;re too scared and pusillanimous to do anything serious about it. The question is: are America and Britain?</p>
]]></html></oembed>