<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"?><oembed><version><![CDATA[1.0]]></version><provider_name><![CDATA[The Dish]]></provider_name><provider_url><![CDATA[http://dish.andrewsullivan.com]]></provider_url><author_name><![CDATA[Andrew Sullivan]]></author_name><author_url><![CDATA[https://dish.andrewsullivan.com/author/sullydish/]]></author_url><title><![CDATA[THE FLU THREAT]]></title><type><![CDATA[link]]></type><html><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;d like to be reassured about the potential effects of a bird flu epidemic, but count me in the still-panicky department. Fareed Zakaria rightly <a href="http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/9787690/site/newsweek" target="_blank">points out</a> that new viruses &#8211; HIV among the most recent &#8211; often leap to humans during major population shifts. Today&#8217;s massive relocation of people and animals in China raises the odds of a new flu virus considerably. We are not doing anything nearly sufficient to prepare for a pandemic &#8211; either with the current bird flu strain or a future one. Money quote: </p>
<blockquote><p>The total funding request for influenza-related research this year is about $119 million. To put this in perspective, we are spending well over $10 billion to research and develop ballistic-missile defenses, which protect us against an unlikely threat (even if they worked). We are spending $4.5 billion a year on R&amp;D-drawings!-for the Pentagon&#8217;s new joint strike fighter. Do we have our priorities right?</p></blockquote>
<p>We need some adjustment. </p>
<p><span style="color:#7c7ca6;font-weight:bold;">A DEPRESSING POLL: </span>A British Defense Ministry <a href="http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml?xml=/news/2005/10/23/wirq23.xml&amp;sSheet=/portal/2005/10/23/ixportaltop.html" target="_blank">poll</a> of Iraqi attitudes suggests deepening hostility to coalition troops. Given their failure to provide even minimal security (which is not the troops&#8217; fault, but their political masters&#8217;), this is fairly understandable. But worrying nonetheless.</p>
]]></html></oembed>