<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"?><oembed><version><![CDATA[1.0]]></version><provider_name><![CDATA[The Dish]]></provider_name><provider_url><![CDATA[http://dish.andrewsullivan.com]]></provider_url><author_name><![CDATA[Andrew Sullivan]]></author_name><author_url><![CDATA[https://dish.andrewsullivan.com/author/sullydish/]]></author_url><title><![CDATA[THEOCONS VERSUS A&nbsp;VACCINE]]></title><type><![CDATA[link]]></type><html><![CDATA[<p>Yep, it&#8217;s hard to believe. Some members of the religious right are <a href="http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?file=/c/a/2005/10/31/MNG2LFGJFT1.DTL#story" target="_blank">opposing mandatory shots</a> for teenagers to protect them against HPV, a virus that can cause cervical cancer. The Bush administration has put one of these people on the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP), at the CDC. The theocons don&#8217;t want to reduce the chances of getting STDs, because they fear it might make having sex less dangerous &#8211; and so encourage more people to be sexually active. I&#8217;m not making this up. Cervical cancer kills more than 3,700 women a year. Acquiescing in these deaths is now part of the &#8220;culture of life.&#8221; </p>
<p><span style="color:#7c7ca6;font-weight:bold;">A MICROBICIDE, PLEASE: </span>This is great news for HIV prevention: a promising <a href="http://www.news-medical.net/?id=14213" target="_blank">microbicide gel</a> that women can use to protect themselves from HIV. Readers of this blog will know I&#8217;ve long been an advocate of such a prophylaxis, particularly for women who may find themselves unable to force their partner to wear a condom. One further question: could this work for gay men as well? And why has there not been more aggressive research for a microbicide for men?</p>
]]></html></oembed>