<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"?><oembed><version><![CDATA[1.0]]></version><provider_name><![CDATA[The Dish]]></provider_name><provider_url><![CDATA[http://dish.andrewsullivan.com]]></provider_url><author_name><![CDATA[Andrew Sullivan]]></author_name><author_url><![CDATA[https://dish.andrewsullivan.com/author/sullydish/]]></author_url><title><![CDATA[THE LION AND THE&nbsp;APE]]></title><type><![CDATA[link]]></type><html><![CDATA[<p>This will be of interest mainly to those folks who obsessively follow box-office returns (you know who <a href="http://www.slate.com/id/2133392/&amp;#paranoia">you</a> <a href="http://www.slate.com/id/2132784/&amp;#kongproject">are</a>), but a few weeks ago, Hugh Hewitt boldly <a href="http://hughhewitt.com/archives/2005/12/04-week/index.php#a000695">predicted</a> that <i>The Lion, The Witch and the Wardrobe</i> would outgross <i>King Kong</i> not only overall, but on <i>Kong</i>&#8216;s opening weekend. This was pure folly, as any BoxOfficeMojo-devotee could have informed Hewitt, and Jonathan Last took <a href="http://galleyslaves.blogspot.com/2005/12/easy-money-updated.html">great pleasure</a> in explaining just why the prediction was so unlikely to come true.</p>
<p>Well, Jonathan was <a href="http://galleyslaves.blogspot.com/2005/12/narnia-watch-verdict-is-in.html">right</a> &#8211; but since the opening weekend, Aslan has been clawing his way back to the top. <i>Kong</i> <a href="http://www.boxofficemojo.com/news/?id=1973&amp;p=.htm">barely outgrossed</a> <i>Narnia</i> over Christmas weekend, and since then the C.S. Lewis adaptation has pulled back into <a href="http://www.boxofficemojo.com/daily/chart/?sortdate=2005-12-28&amp;p=.htm">the lead</a>, making money hand over paw (sorry, sorry).</p>
<p>I&#8217;m a little surprised by this turn, in part because in spite of being smack in the middle of the target demographic for <a href="http://www.theatlantic.com/doc/200505/douthat">Philip Anschutz&#8217;s big project</a>, I actually preferred <i>Kong</i> to <i>Narnia</i> (my complaints about the latter are <a href="http://www.theamericanscene.com/2005/12/narnia-its-fine-movie.php">here</a>), though both were miles from perfect. (Steve Sailer has it <a href="http://isteve.blogspot.com/2005/12/king-kong.html">right</a> &#8211; there were two hours of a great movie in <i>Kong</i>, but unfortunately the film was three hours long.) But it&#8217;s still gratifying that <i>Narnia</i>&#8216;s doing well, if only because it means they&#8217;ll film the later books &#8211; and hopefully, as with the Harry Potter movies, the adaptations will get better as they go along.</p>
<p>Unfortunately, the one they&#8217;ve started on, <i>Prince Caspian</i>, is one of the weakest of the seven &#8211; and the one after that, <i>The Voyage of the Dawn Treader</i>, is pretty dull as well. (If there&#8217;s any Narnia book where the religious allegory gets in the way of the story, it&#8217;s <i>Dawn Treader</i>.) And it would be a shame if audience interest dries up before they get around to <i>The Horse and His Boy</i>, or <i>The Magician&#8217;s Nephew</i>, or my personal favorite, <i>The Silver Chair</i>. (I&#8217;m hoping for Jeremy Irons as <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Puddleglum">Puddleglum</a> . . .)</p>
<p><i>&#8211; posted by Ross</i></p>
]]></html></oembed>