<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"?><oembed><version><![CDATA[1.0]]></version><provider_name><![CDATA[The Dish]]></provider_name><provider_url><![CDATA[http://dish.andrewsullivan.com]]></provider_url><author_name><![CDATA[Andrew Sullivan]]></author_name><author_url><![CDATA[https://dish.andrewsullivan.com/author/sullydish/]]></author_url><title><![CDATA[Independence Day]]></title><type><![CDATA[link]]></type><html><![CDATA[
<p>I&#8217;ve had fewer emails like this one than I expected, but it&#8217;s worth airing the issue:</p>
<blockquote>
<p>&quot;For the most part, I agree with the emailer who was iffy on the redesign &#8212; though I have to say it&#8217;s great to finally read black type on a white background.&nbsp; Also, I second the previous emailer&#8217;s concern about your site now being bought and paid for by Time magazine.&nbsp; This is the equivalent of those organic, once-independent family farm operations that, once success descends, sell out to big conglomerates out to hedge their bets on the latest big thing.&nbsp; Hope you keep your independence, Andrew, but this signals a bad, bad trend of MSM reaching into the blogosphere and making it its own.&quot;</p>
</blockquote>
<p>I beg to differ. I can categorically tell you that the rules for my blogging are what they always have been. No one is pre-editing my posts; no one is looking over my shoulder. Time&#8217;s editors have never pressured me to write anything I don&#8217;t fully believe in print, and anyone who knows my past knows I&#8217;m not exactly renowned for currying favor with my bosses. I think what&#8217;s happening here is the opposite of what the reader thinks. Think of it as the blogosphere reaching out to the MSM and helping erase what is, in any case, a somewhat strained distinction. But this much I&#8217;ll ask you. If you think I&#8217;m going soft, let me know. As if I needed to tell you that.</p>
]]></html></oembed>