<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"?><oembed><version><![CDATA[1.0]]></version><provider_name><![CDATA[The Dish]]></provider_name><provider_url><![CDATA[http://dish.andrewsullivan.com]]></provider_url><author_name><![CDATA[Andrew Sullivan]]></author_name><author_url><![CDATA[https://dish.andrewsullivan.com/author/sullydish/]]></author_url><title><![CDATA[The Clueless Globe]]></title><type><![CDATA[link]]></type><html><![CDATA[
<p>Here&#8217;s <a href="http://www.boston.com/news/globe/editorial_opinion/editorials/articles/2006/02/04/forms_of_intolerance/">a sentence</a> about the publishing of the Danish cartoons that should bring anyone up short:</p>
<blockquote>
<p>&quot;This was a case of seeking a reason to exercise a freedom that had not been challenged.&quot;</p>
</blockquote>
<p>The body of Pim Fortuyn was not challenge enough? The fatwa on Rushdie? The murder of Theo van Gogh? Maybe if the Boston Globe had covered these events with a greater sense of their importance, they would understand why Danish artists were and are living in a climate of fear. Then there&#8217;s this:</p>
<blockquote>
<p>&quot;Depicting Mohammed wearing a turban in the form of a bomb with a sputtering fuse is no less hurtful to most Muslims than Nazi caricatures of Jews or Ku Klux Klan caricatures of blacks are to those victims of intolerance.&quot;</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Can someone let me know if the Globe has ever editorialized against the publication of vicious anti-Semitic images in the government-run Arab press?</p>
]]></html></oembed>