<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"?><oembed><version><![CDATA[1.0]]></version><provider_name><![CDATA[The Dish]]></provider_name><provider_url><![CDATA[http://dish.andrewsullivan.com]]></provider_url><author_name><![CDATA[Andrew Sullivan]]></author_name><author_url><![CDATA[https://dish.andrewsullivan.com/author/sullydish/]]></author_url><title><![CDATA[Spam vs the&nbsp;BVM]]></title><type><![CDATA[link]]></type><html><![CDATA[
<p>A priest writes:</p>
<blockquote>
<p>Your link to the <a href="http://dailydish.typepad.com/the_daily_dish/2006/05/check_that_spam.html">Guardian article</a> on spam blockers not allowing the word &quot;erection&quot; through caused me to laugh. My parish is the Church of St. Mary the Virgin, in Manhattan. Our Web address used to be stmvirgin.org, but because we used the word &quot;virgin,&quot; many spam blockers would not allow our messages to go through. So we have changed to stmvnyc.org, and now we have no problems.&nbsp; Apparently Our Lady through her intercessions was not able to fix this problem related to the word &quot;Virgin,&quot; even though we were referring to her!</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Call it the web&#8217;s immaculate misconception.</p>
]]></html></oembed>