<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"?><oembed><version><![CDATA[1.0]]></version><provider_name><![CDATA[The Dish]]></provider_name><provider_url><![CDATA[http://dish.andrewsullivan.com]]></provider_url><author_name><![CDATA[Andrew Sullivan]]></author_name><author_url><![CDATA[https://dish.andrewsullivan.com/author/sullydish/]]></author_url><title><![CDATA[Rage Against the&nbsp;Bobos]]></title><type><![CDATA[link]]></type><html><![CDATA[
<p>[Reihan] <a href="http://andrewsullivan.theatlantic.com/the_daily_dish/2007/04/bobos_in_paradi.html">Ross&#8217;s post</a> on <em>The Onion</em>&#8216;s <a href="http://www.theonion.com/content/node/60836/print/"><em>This American Life</em></a> gag got me to thinking.&nbsp; This is so rare for me that I figured I&#8217;d celebrate this special occasion with a rambling post!</p>
<p>People (mainly obtuse people) forget that <em><a href="http://www.amazon.com/Bobos-Paradise-Upper-Class-There/dp/0684853787">Bobos in Paradise</a></em>, written by my friend and former boss, was written from an insider&#8217;s perspective. The book was funny and fun, but it was also an incisive critique that was in part a self-critique. Now, this is pretty hard for some people to understand.  How can David Brooks be criticizing Bobos and identifying with them at the same time?&nbsp;  Surely this is some kind of tactic designed to lull you into a false sense of security before he sneakily discredits namby-pamby liberals!  Well, no.  Sometimes a cigar is a cigar.&nbsp;  Like most thoughtful people, Brooks is large: he contains multitudes.  So when David Brooks railed (with tongue firmly in cheek) against &quot;<a href="http://select.nytimes.com/2007/02/25/opinion/25brooks.html?hp=&#038;pagewanted=print">hipster parents</a>,&quot; he wasn&#8217;t bashing liberals (as some people assumed). Rather, he was using humor (gasp!) to make a pretty simple point: your kids shouldn&#8217;t be your billboards.&nbsp;  Narcissism has its limits. I mean, the kid featured in this article wasn&#8217;t born this way.</p>
<blockquote><p>I expected the food to be like Campbell&#8217;s soup, but it&#8217;s not at all. It&#8217;s pretty good, but not for a guy like me. I prefer Citarella or Dean &amp; DeLuca. I treasure things like an aged balsamic vinegar and truffles—the mushrooms, not the chocolate. —Jake</p></blockquote>
<p>Jake is a boy.  A boy at grave risk of growing up to become an insufferable man.&nbsp;  (By the way, it&#8217;s at least as likely that Jake is the song of a right-leaning financier as a left-leaning screenwriter.)  As the parent of young children, and indeed as a Bobo parent of young children, Brooks is exposed to this phenomenon on a regular basis.&nbsp;  Brooks isn&#8217;t point-scoring against liberals: he&#8217;s expressing compassion for young people.</p>
<p>But there are some conservatives who <em>do</em> spend much of their time performing anti-Bobo rage.&nbsp; It&#8217;s not about the children.&nbsp; It&#8217;s not even about moral turpitude.&nbsp; It&#8217;s affect about affect, and it&#8217;s pretty much all that&#8217;s left when you&#8217;ve run out of ideas.  As someone who cares about conservative ideas, this bums me out.  But I actually think post-Bush conservatives have a decent shot at getting past this.</p>
]]></html></oembed>