<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"?><oembed><version><![CDATA[1.0]]></version><provider_name><![CDATA[The Dish]]></provider_name><provider_url><![CDATA[http://dish.andrewsullivan.com]]></provider_url><author_name><![CDATA[Andrew Sullivan]]></author_name><author_url><![CDATA[https://dish.andrewsullivan.com/author/sullydish/]]></author_url><title><![CDATA[The Clinton-Obama Poll]]></title><type><![CDATA[link]]></type><html><![CDATA[
<p>It&#8217;s obviously an aberration as a primary indicator. But surely a lot of its aberration has to do with the <a href="http://www.usatoday.com/printedition/news/20070605/1a_bottomstrip05.art.htm">following fact</a>:</p>
<blockquote>
<p>The survey of 310 Democrats <em>and 160 independents who &quot;lean&quot; Democratic</em>, taken Friday through Sunday, has a margin of error of +/-5 percentage points&#8230; <span class="inside-copy">Among Democrats alone, Clinton leads Obama by 5 points, 34%-29%. That&#8217;s a significant narrowing from the USA TODAY Poll taken in mid-May, when she led by 17 points. Among independents, Obama leads by 9 points, 31%-22%.</span></p>
</blockquote>
<p>Clinton has the base support that her name, her husband and her long record among the Democrats have earned her. But as a general election candidate, as someone who can appeal to independents and Republicans, as someone who can actually enlarge the Democrats &#8211; Obama is quite obviously the superior candidate. Do the Dems want to go forward and outward? Or backward and inward? That&#8217;s the choice they face between the Senator from Illinois and the Senator from New York.</p>
]]></html></oembed>