<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"?><oembed><version><![CDATA[1.0]]></version><provider_name><![CDATA[The Dish]]></provider_name><provider_url><![CDATA[http://dish.andrewsullivan.com]]></provider_url><author_name><![CDATA[Andrew Sullivan]]></author_name><author_url><![CDATA[https://dish.andrewsullivan.com/author/sullydish/]]></author_url><title><![CDATA[The Mukasey Precedent]]></title><type><![CDATA[link]]></type><html><![CDATA[If you want to see how the pro-torture right will use Feinstein's and Schumer's capitulation on the rule of law to advance the torture program, read <a href="http://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2007/11/the_campaign_against_mukasey.html">Rich Lowry</a>:</p><blockquote><p>The Senate had a chance to settle the question in September 2006 when Sen. Ted Kennedy offered an amendment to declare waterboarding and other coercive interrogation techniques a violation of Common Article 3 of the Geneva Conventions. His amendment lost 46-53. So Senate Democrats are now demanding that Mukasey declare waterboarding a violation of Common Article 3 when the Senate declined to do the same just a year ago.</p></blockquote><p>The current Republican standard is that if the Congress does not explicitly forbid <em>specific</em> torture techniques as illegal, then they're legal. They hold that the clear and broad legal standard - &quot;severe mental or physical pain or suffering&quot; - is too broad and too clear to accommodate what a handful of men, i.e. Bush, Cheney, Rumsfeld, Addington, et al. want to do with prisoners under their control. ]]></html><thumbnail_url><![CDATA[https://sullydish.files.wordpress.com/2007/11/schumerchipsomodevillagetty.jpg?fit=440%2C330]]></thumbnail_url><thumbnail_width><![CDATA[440]]></thumbnail_width><thumbnail_height><![CDATA[293]]></thumbnail_height></oembed>