<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"?><oembed><version><![CDATA[1.0]]></version><provider_name><![CDATA[The Dish]]></provider_name><provider_url><![CDATA[http://dish.andrewsullivan.com]]></provider_url><author_name><![CDATA[Andrew Sullivan]]></author_name><author_url><![CDATA[https://dish.andrewsullivan.com/author/sullydish/]]></author_url><title><![CDATA[Bill Clinton&#8217;s Foreign&nbsp;Policy]]></title><type><![CDATA[link]]></type><html><![CDATA[I'm with this reader:</p><blockquote><p>The writer of <a href="http://andrewsullivan.theatlantic.com/the_daily_dish/2008/01/a-reader-writ-2.html">the email yesterday</a> is the one who should get his/her facts straight. The Bosnian conflict ended, not with either Clinton or NATO leadership but despite the lack of it. Only after the military tide turned in Bosnia due to Muslim countries ignoring the weapons trading ban such that the Bosnians could actually fight the Serbs on somewhat even terms did the Serbs ever come to the &quot;peace&quot; table. Even then, the Dayton Accord did more to save Milosevic to massacre another day (see Kosovo a few years later) than it ever did for the Bosnians. Besides, is the writer now saying that George H.W. Bush should have been more &quot;unilateral&quot; and less &quot;multilateral&quot; with our EU allies?]]></html></oembed>