<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"?><oembed><version><![CDATA[1.0]]></version><provider_name><![CDATA[The Dish]]></provider_name><provider_url><![CDATA[http://dish.andrewsullivan.com]]></provider_url><author_name><![CDATA[Andrew Sullivan]]></author_name><author_url><![CDATA[https://dish.andrewsullivan.com/author/sullydish/]]></author_url><title><![CDATA[Obama&#8217;s &#8220;Waffle&#8221; On&nbsp;Iraq]]></title><type><![CDATA[link]]></type><html><![CDATA[
<p>A reader writes:</p>
<blockquote>
<p>This is exactly this sort of thoughtfulness and <a href="http://andrewsullivan.theatlantic.com/the_daily_dish/2008/01/did-obama-waffl.html">intellectual honesty</a> that makes Obama so appealing.&nbsp; Rather than give a facile political answer, he was open to the possibility that more information could affect his opinion.&nbsp; To me this is not a waffle at all, just a recognition that one&#8217;s position should be determined by the available facts.</p>
<p>This came out during Saturday&#8217;s debate, during the health care discussion.&nbsp; Clinton tried to claim he had changed positions; he calmly explained that in a hypothetical sense, the single-payer system made sense, but given the practical reality in the US, a different approach was required.&nbsp; This is nuanced and transparent, and I&#8217;m in favor.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>And that is why a <a href="http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/redirect?link_code=as2&amp;path=ASIN/0060934379&amp; tag=wwwandrews u0a-20&amp;camp=1789&amp;creative=9325">conservative of doubt</a> can support him.</p>
]]></html></oembed>