<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"?><oembed><version><![CDATA[1.0]]></version><provider_name><![CDATA[The Dish]]></provider_name><provider_url><![CDATA[http://dish.andrewsullivan.com]]></provider_url><author_name><![CDATA[Andrew Sullivan]]></author_name><author_url><![CDATA[https://dish.andrewsullivan.com/author/sullydish/]]></author_url><title><![CDATA[Iraq And The&nbsp;Future]]></title><type><![CDATA[link]]></type><html><![CDATA[A reader writes: </p><blockquote><p>Bainbridge is <a href="http://andrewsullivan.theatlantic.com/the_daily_dish/2008/01/iraq-as-a-small.html">focused</a> on finding a way to package the problem to help his friends at the polls. He needs to focus on a way out for us; indeed, we all do. The public debate so far is &quot;the surge is working&quot; vs. &quot;the surge failed.&quot; This is infantile nonsense. There are two tracks, which must be considered independently. One is the military track. Here the military has performed consistently with plans, but at a very dramatic cost (I am talking more about treasure than blood, but the latter is not to be dismissed lightly).&nbsp; ]]></html></oembed>