<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"?><oembed><version><![CDATA[1.0]]></version><provider_name><![CDATA[The Dish]]></provider_name><provider_url><![CDATA[http://dish.andrewsullivan.com]]></provider_url><author_name><![CDATA[Andrew Sullivan]]></author_name><author_url><![CDATA[https://dish.andrewsullivan.com/author/sullydish/]]></author_url><title><![CDATA[Cohen vs Obama]]></title><type><![CDATA[link]]></type><html><![CDATA[
<p>The more I think about it, the more disgraceful <a href="http://andrewsullivan.theatlantic.com/the_daily_dish/2008/01/and-so-it-conti.html">that column</a> was. Pure identity politics paranoia. A Jewish columnist sees a black man running for president and the first thing he asks himself is: where is this guy on Farrakhan? And Obama has to <em>disprove</em> his connections, even though there is not even a smidgen of evidence connecting the two, and even, as <a href="http://www.talkingpointsmemo.com/horsesmouth/2008/01/everybodys_alre.php">Greg Sargent points out</a>, Obama&#8217;s own spokesman explicitly disowned any support for Farrakhan in the same column.</p>
<p>If Obama has to disown a man he has never had anything to do with and a man whose toxic racist politics Obama has consistently and continuously opposed with all his might, then <em>every</em> black candidate is forced to jump through Cohen&#8217;s petty little racist litmus test. They&#8217;re all guilty of anti-Semitism until proved innocent. And Cohen&#8217;s transparent disavowals of such an insinuation make it worse not better.</p>
<p>We are learning a lot through this primary process &#8211; especially about some powerful white liberals and race. What we&#8217;re learning isn&#8217;t pretty. </p>
]]></html></oembed>