<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"?><oembed><version><![CDATA[1.0]]></version><provider_name><![CDATA[The Dish]]></provider_name><provider_url><![CDATA[http://dish.andrewsullivan.com]]></provider_url><author_name><![CDATA[Andrew Sullivan]]></author_name><author_url><![CDATA[https://dish.andrewsullivan.com/author/sullydish/]]></author_url><title><![CDATA[The Clintons Are&nbsp;Outraged]]></title><type><![CDATA[link]]></type><html><![CDATA[
<p>It seems to me that Novak <a href="http://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2008/01/vetting_obama.html">cuts to the chase</a> of this hideous race-row that the Clintons and their allies jump-started to derail the Obama campaign:</p>
<blockquote>
<p>The fight really was about the Clintons&#8217; resenting an obstacle on their return to the White House. A prominent Democrat who saw the former president this week described him as &quot;furious, outraged, angry and utterly dismissive of Obama.&quot;</p>
<p>That anger was reflected by Hillary Clinton&#8217;s performance on NBC&#8217;s &quot;Meet the Press&quot; last Sunday, when she said, &quot;When Sen. Obama&#8217;s chief strategist accuses me of playing a role in Benazir Bhutto&#8217;s assassination, there&#8217;s silence (from Obama).&quot; Actually, David Axelrod never made such an accusation. He said former Prime Minister Bhutto&#8217;s death will &quot;call into issue the judgment&quot; of &quot;taking the eye off the ball and making the wrong judgment in going into Iraq.&quot; Perhaps Hillary Clinton&#8217;s comments should be vetted.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>What we&#8217;re seeing is the Clintons&#8217; amazement that anyone &#8211; white or black &#8211; could dare challenge the Restoration Project. It will make defeating them all the more satisfying. The Republicans haven&#8217;t managed it in a long time.</p>
]]></html></oembed>