<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"?><oembed><version><![CDATA[1.0]]></version><provider_name><![CDATA[The Dish]]></provider_name><provider_url><![CDATA[http://dish.andrewsullivan.com]]></provider_url><author_name><![CDATA[Andrew Sullivan]]></author_name><author_url><![CDATA[https://dish.andrewsullivan.com/author/sullydish/]]></author_url><title><![CDATA[The Fluid Electorate]]></title><type><![CDATA[link]]></type><html><![CDATA[
<p>Michael Barone is always worth reading. I think he&#8217;s wrong in prematurely judging the surge a success, but this is an interesting <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB120235128484149553.html?mod=opinion_main_commentaries">insight:</a></p>
<blockquote>
<p>Somewhere between Hurricane Katrina in August 2005 and the bombing of the Samarra mosque in February 2006, I believe we entered a period of open-field politics, in which voters and candidates are moving around &#8212; a field in which there are no familiar landmarks or new signposts.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Those were the headline stories that showed that government was broken at home and that the Iraq occupation would be for ever. Voters want a competent government and no Mesopotamian empire. Who can give them both?</p>
]]></html></oembed>