<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"?><oembed><version><![CDATA[1.0]]></version><provider_name><![CDATA[The Dish]]></provider_name><provider_url><![CDATA[http://dish.andrewsullivan.com]]></provider_url><author_name><![CDATA[Andrew Sullivan]]></author_name><author_url><![CDATA[https://dish.andrewsullivan.com/author/sullydish/]]></author_url><title><![CDATA[Women And Hillary]]></title><type><![CDATA[link]]></type><html><![CDATA[
<p><a href="http://commentisfree.guardian.co.uk/michelle_goldberg/2008/03/hell_hath_no_fury.html">Michelle Goldberg</a>:</p>
<blockquote>
<p>Some have suggested the whole thing was part of a Clinton scheme to ratchet up racial tensions in advance of the Pennsylvania primary. That&#8217;s possible, but there&#8217;s a simpler explanation. Several otherwise admirable, even heroic women seem to identify with Clinton so profoundly that they interpret rejection of her as a personal rebuke. Stung, they accuse Obama supporters of flighty illogic, but there&#8217;s a powerful, extra-rational emotional current in their arguments, a flailing in the face of an imagined betrayal. In their anger, they&#8217;re lashing out in all kinds of counterproductive ways, doing far more damage to feminism than a Clinton loss ever could.</p>
</blockquote>
]]></html></oembed>