<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"?><oembed><version><![CDATA[1.0]]></version><provider_name><![CDATA[The Dish]]></provider_name><provider_url><![CDATA[http://dish.andrewsullivan.com]]></provider_url><author_name><![CDATA[Andrew Sullivan]]></author_name><author_url><![CDATA[https://dish.andrewsullivan.com/author/sullydish/]]></author_url><title><![CDATA[More Dissents]]></title><type><![CDATA[link]]></type><html><![CDATA[A reader writes: </p><blockquote><p>I have to share your <a href="http://andrewsullivan.theatlantic.com/the_daily_dish/2008/05/dissent-of-th-2.html">Dissent of the Day's</a> sentiment, though for different reasons.&nbsp; I'd given some thought to the possibility you propose, but then I began imagining the liberties our current Vice President has taken with regard to the powers of his office--terrible, and disturbing, precedents. I know you'd agree.&nbsp; I'm not and have never been among those spouting the she-had-Vince-Foster-murdered meme, but we've all been witnesses to the Clintons' hunger for power, their sense of entitlement--remember the &quot;inevitability&quot; meme?&nbsp; Why feed that by granting her the vice-presidency?&nbsp; To put her a step away from the Presidency, though it would certainly be a magnanimous gesture on Obama's part, would be, I fear, far too much temptation.&nbsp; She--both directly and through those closest to her--has shown herself to be far less magnanimous, especially toward those whom she feels &quot;owe&quot; her and her husband.]]></html></oembed>