<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"?><oembed><version><![CDATA[1.0]]></version><provider_name><![CDATA[The Dish]]></provider_name><provider_url><![CDATA[http://dish.andrewsullivan.com]]></provider_url><author_name><![CDATA[Andrew Sullivan]]></author_name><author_url><![CDATA[https://dish.andrewsullivan.com/author/sullydish/]]></author_url><title><![CDATA[The Jacksonian Betrayal]]></title><type><![CDATA[link]]></type><html><![CDATA[
<p>A reader writes:</p>
<blockquote>
<p>The interesting thing about Bush’s <a href="http://andrewsullivan.theatlantic.com/the_daily_dish/2008/05/obamas-crusade.html">Wilsonian intervention policy</a> is that he was able to secure large scale support from Jacksonian America to make it happen, which is highly skeptical of Wilsonian foreign policy endeavors.&nbsp; How he did it will probably be the ticket to someone’s PhD. in history someday, but in short he sold Jacksonians on a threat, promised “Shock and Awe” against the enemy, and demanded nothing short of victory.&nbsp; Bush viewed Jacksonians as simpletons with a bloodlust, and used their patriotism to further an admittedly clueless strategy to reshape the Middle-East.&nbsp; As far as our reasons for being in Iraq go, the only issue left to sell to Jacksonians is victory over a multitude of fifth rate bad guys. </p>
<p>Those of us who identify with Jacksonian America, and the legitimate need for a total national commitment to war from time to time just don’t buy it any more. The Bush/McCain GOP is going to have a hard time bringing Jacksonian America along for another four to eight years of pandering and failure. </p>
</blockquote>
<p>How did he do it? The key, I think, to his narrow 2004 victory was the invocation of religious loyalty. It is sometimes astonishing to see how much damage one president can do to so much in so little a time. </p>
]]></html></oembed>