<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"?><oembed><version><![CDATA[1.0]]></version><provider_name><![CDATA[The Dish]]></provider_name><provider_url><![CDATA[http://dish.andrewsullivan.com]]></provider_url><author_name><![CDATA[Andrew Sullivan]]></author_name><author_url><![CDATA[https://dish.andrewsullivan.com/author/sullydish/]]></author_url><title><![CDATA[Orwell Watch]]></title><type><![CDATA[link]]></type><html><![CDATA[
<p><span style="font-size: 0.8em;"><em>by Chris Bodenner</em></span> <br />Peter Kirsanow <a href="http://corner.nationalreview.com/post/?q=OGVjMWZiODQ3OTgxMDhhMDIxMDg1YzllNzU2ZTdmMjk=">notes</a>:   </p>
<blockquote>
<p>Voters are far more favorably disposed to policies described as &quot;affirmative action&quot; than they are to policies described as &quot;racial preferences.&quot; When a policy is described as &quot;affirmative action,&quot; polls show an almost even split in support and opposition. In contrast, a Newsweek poll last summer showed that Americans oppose &quot;racial preferences&quot; by a margin of 82%—14%. The opposition to &quot;racial preferences&quot; also includes a plurality of blacks. &#8230; Thus, supporters of preferences employ the term &quot;affirmative action&quot;— a benign policy designed to &quot;level the playing field.&quot; Who could be opposed to that?</p>
</blockquote>
]]></html></oembed>