<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"?><oembed><version><![CDATA[1.0]]></version><provider_name><![CDATA[The Dish]]></provider_name><provider_url><![CDATA[http://dish.andrewsullivan.com]]></provider_url><author_name><![CDATA[Andrew Sullivan]]></author_name><author_url><![CDATA[https://dish.andrewsullivan.com/author/sullydish/]]></author_url><title><![CDATA[Blogs Killed Satire]]></title><type><![CDATA[link]]></type><html><![CDATA[
<p><span style="font-size: 0.8em;"><em>by Chris Bodenner</em> </span><br />Apparently the &quot;right-wing&quot; blogger I <a href="http://andrewsullivan.theatlantic.com/the_daily_dish/2008/07/clearing-the-ba.html">criticized</a> in my earlier post was being <a href="http://theflatlandalmanack.typepad.com/versus/2008/07/mccain-bringin.html">ironic</a>:</p>
<blockquote>
<p>Satire&#8217;s getting harder and harder to pull off&#8211;and we&#8217;re just beginners.  Though we strongly disagree with Mr. [Bodenner] about affirmative action, Mr. Public was satirizing the sort of far right blogger who finds a justification for his wrong opinions even in very rationally expressed views that coincide only slightly with his own, such as Mr. [Bodenner]&#8217;s.  Everything Mr. [Bodenner] says in his post is correct as a response to this sort of thinking. Maybe satire is really dead because there is no wrong opinion, no matter how extreme or looney, that doesn&#8217;t appear somewhere on the internet.&nbsp; I&#8217;m not sure it&#8217;s possible to be sufficiently over the top anymore for people to recognize satire.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>He makes a great point; his exaggerated post still falls short of the extreme rhetoric I regularly find in the blogosphere.&nbsp; So regardless of its true intent, the spoof was a good foil.&nbsp; &nbsp;</p>
]]></html></oembed>