<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"?><oembed><version><![CDATA[1.0]]></version><provider_name><![CDATA[The Dish]]></provider_name><provider_url><![CDATA[http://dish.andrewsullivan.com]]></provider_url><author_name><![CDATA[Andrew Sullivan]]></author_name><author_url><![CDATA[https://dish.andrewsullivan.com/author/sullydish/]]></author_url><title><![CDATA[The Tory Position]]></title><type><![CDATA[link]]></type><html><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://corner.nationalreview.com/post/?q=ZGFkYjk4OWE5OTQzZTE4YjM2ZjA1MDhmYWI2N2FiY2Q=">Stuttaford</a> keeps me sane at NRO:</p>
<blockquote>
<p><span class="390021515-14082008">What we have to recognize is that Russia is a (sorta) great power trying to do what great powers do. This will involve plenty of jostling, shoving, pushing, and all the rest of it. It won&#8217;t always be pretty, particularly given the KGB-stained nature of Russia&#8217;s current leadership. On occasion, the U.S. will have to shove back, and shove back very firmly. That said, to try using what&#8217;s going on in Georgia (as some seem inclined to do) as the inspiration of some sort of revived Cold War is not the way to go.</span></p>
</blockquote>
<blockquote>
<p><span class="390021515-14082008">It&#8217;s critical to remember that what rivalry there is between the U.S. and Russia is not ideological </span><span class="390021515-14082008"> to any meaningful degree</span><span class="390021515-14082008">. Moscow is neither Riyadh nor Tehran. Yes, yes, at some level, Russia is, and will remain, a strategic competitor. That&#8217;s fine. In a multi-polar world, that&#8217;s life. At, another, deeper, and more important level, however, many of Russia&#8217;s strategic interests are aligned with those of the U.S. The trick will be in getting the Kremlin to act on that ultimately reassuring fact. </span></p>
</blockquote>
<p class="blog_permalink">
]]></html></oembed>