nothing - about why his 2004 position that those responsible for Abu Ghraib should be jailed or executed has evaporated. My own position on torture has been consistent from Day One of the war. It genuinely didn't occur to me that any president would adopt the standards of Communists and Nazis in prosecuting it. So yes, discovering such an atrocity was perhaps the deepest reason I changed my position on Bush entirely. Finding out that a man you supported in good faith is actually a war criminal will do that. But what I have also done is make a deep, grueling and long attempt to take responsibility for my original misjudgment, and show how my own changed position on Bush has much to do with what we subsequently discovered and that was, at the time, unknown to me. ]]>