<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"?><oembed><version><![CDATA[1.0]]></version><provider_name><![CDATA[The Dish]]></provider_name><provider_url><![CDATA[http://dish.andrewsullivan.com]]></provider_url><author_name><![CDATA[Andrew Sullivan]]></author_name><author_url><![CDATA[https://dish.andrewsullivan.com/author/sullydish/]]></author_url><title><![CDATA[Trust]]></title><type><![CDATA[link]]></type><html><![CDATA[Greenwald <a href="http://www.salon.com/opinion/greenwald/2008/12/19/obama/index.html">responds</a>:</p><blockquote><p>Andrew's <a href="http://andrewsullivan.theatlantic.com/the_daily_dish/2008/12/taking-yes-for.html">argument</a> here is the one that Obama loyalists generally are making: yes, what Obama is doing might appear to be exactly the same as what Democrats have been doing since forever -- the accommodationist embrace of the Right, the effort to establish centrist credentials by scorning the Left, running away from cultural issues for fear of being depicted as amoral radicals, surrounding oneself with establishment and conservative figures, etc. etc. (Bill Clinton also had a Republican Defense Secretary).&nbsp; Yes, that may look exactly like what the capitulating Bush-era Democrats and the triangulating Bill &quot;the Third Way!&quot; Clinton spent years and years and years doing.]]></html></oembed>