<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"?><oembed><version><![CDATA[1.0]]></version><provider_name><![CDATA[The Dish]]></provider_name><provider_url><![CDATA[http://dish.andrewsullivan.com]]></provider_url><author_name><![CDATA[Andrew Sullivan]]></author_name><author_url><![CDATA[https://dish.andrewsullivan.com/author/sullydish/]]></author_url><title><![CDATA[Proportionality And Terror]]></title><type><![CDATA[link]]></type><html><![CDATA[Noah Pollak <a href="http://andrewsullivan.theatlantic.com/the_daily_dish/2009/01/just-war.html">asked me</a> to provide some framework for a discussion of proportionality and just war theory with respect to the Israeli attack on Gaza. In re-reading my Catechism and brushing up on just war theory, I am struck first of all by how alien the context seems for the current war. The asymmetric nature of the threat and the emergence of failed states run by mafioso religious fanatics makes everything more complicated. You could argue that this makes just war theory more important, rather than less, since we are in danger of having the rules of war dictated by barbarians. Or you could argue, along with the neocons, that Jihadist barbarism demands a response in kind. I favor the first view. And it is nonetheless fair to say, I think, that Israel's actions in Gaza fail every traditional just war justification.]]></html><thumbnail_url><![CDATA[https://sullydish.files.wordpress.com/2009/01/sderotdavidsilvermangetty.jpg?fit=440%2C330]]></thumbnail_url><thumbnail_width><![CDATA[200]]></thumbnail_width><thumbnail_height><![CDATA[133]]></thumbnail_height></oembed>