<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"?><oembed><version><![CDATA[1.0]]></version><provider_name><![CDATA[The Dish]]></provider_name><provider_url><![CDATA[http://dish.andrewsullivan.com]]></provider_url><author_name><![CDATA[Andrew Sullivan]]></author_name><author_url><![CDATA[https://dish.andrewsullivan.com/author/sullydish/]]></author_url><title><![CDATA[The Rosen-Greenwald Spat]]></title><type><![CDATA[link]]></type><html><![CDATA[
<p>Since I know both men, like and respect both, and know next to nothing about Judge Sotomayor, the wise thing is to shut the fuck up. But, er, this is a blog, and one is required not to shut the fuck up most of the time. So I will merely note how interesting it is as a media phenomenon. Washington&#39;s old journalistic guard is not yet fully aware that the pool they operate in now is much larger than it was, and the cozy familiarity of it all &#8211; the sustenance of reputation, the quiet hierarchy of the Northwest quadrant &#8211; is now history. What might have been sent into the ether as a small <a href="http://www.tnr.com/politics/story.html?id=45d56e6f-f497-4b19-9c63-04e10199a085">provocation</a>, summing up a coterie&#39;s assumptions, will no longer be given credence because of its provenance. It will have to make its case in a <a href="http://www.salon.com/opinion/greenwald/2009/05/05/tnr/">brutally frank </a>environment. Or fail to. </p>
]]></html></oembed>