<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"?><oembed><version><![CDATA[1.0]]></version><provider_name><![CDATA[The Dish]]></provider_name><provider_url><![CDATA[http://dish.andrewsullivan.com]]></provider_url><author_name><![CDATA[Andrew Sullivan]]></author_name><author_url><![CDATA[https://dish.andrewsullivan.com/author/sullydish/]]></author_url><title><![CDATA[Margins Of Error]]></title><type><![CDATA[link]]></type><html><![CDATA[<div style="text-align: left;"><em><span style="font-size: 12px; font-family: Arial;"></span></em>The <em>Economist</em> <a href="http://www.economist.com/opinion/displaystory.cfm?story_id=13648968">ponders</a> banking reform:<br /><br /><div class="blockquote" style="margin-left: 40px;">Smarter regulators and better rules would help. But sadly, as the crisis has brutally shown, regulators are fallible. In time, financiers tend to gain the advantage over their overseers. They are better paid, better qualified and more influential than the regulators. Legislators are easily seduced by booms and lobbies. Voters are ignorant of and bored by regulation. The more a financial system depends on the wisdom of regulators, the more likely it is to fail catastrophically.</div>]]></html></oembed>