<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"?><oembed><version><![CDATA[1.0]]></version><provider_name><![CDATA[The Dish]]></provider_name><provider_url><![CDATA[http://dish.andrewsullivan.com]]></provider_url><author_name><![CDATA[Andrew Sullivan]]></author_name><author_url><![CDATA[https://dish.andrewsullivan.com/author/sullydish/]]></author_url><title><![CDATA[On Amalek]]></title><type><![CDATA[link]]></type><html><![CDATA[
<p>Jeffrey <a href="http://jeffreygoldberg.theatlantic.com/archives/2009/05/on_misreading_amalek.php">responds</a>. He makes two important points: Netanyahu has not personally used the Amalek analogy in public; and Iran&#39;s regime is not comparable in terms of aggression and threat to Israel&#39;s. He&#39;s right about both. My concern is that this assumption about Israel&#39;s inherent decency can lead to rhetorical blunders. And that it can lead us to grant Israel lee-way we would not give others. I&#39;m thinking, of course, of Gaza. </p>
]]></html></oembed>