<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"?><oembed><version><![CDATA[1.0]]></version><provider_name><![CDATA[The Dish]]></provider_name><provider_url><![CDATA[http://dish.andrewsullivan.com]]></provider_url><author_name><![CDATA[Andrew Sullivan]]></author_name><author_url><![CDATA[https://dish.andrewsullivan.com/author/sullydish/]]></author_url><title><![CDATA[Gays, HRC And&nbsp;Obama]]></title><type><![CDATA[link]]></type><html><![CDATA[
<p>Things are getting testier. <a href="http://www.americablog.com/2009/06/hrc-and-obama.html">Aravosis</a>:</p>
<div class="blockquote" style="margin-left: 40px;">Many of us have been worried that the Obama administration might be trying to Sista Souljah the gays (i.e., distance themselves from the gays to show just how independent, how &quot;new Democrat,&quot; they really are). The irony is that the embattled lead gay groups, in order to survive in an increasingly angry post-Prop-8, and increasingly expectant post-MA-NH-VT-IA-ME-CT, world, may end up having to Sista Souljah Obama in order to regain credibility in the eyes of their own members.</div>
<p>I&#39;m not so convinced the White House has made this decision, even though Rahm&#39;s Clintonian gay-aversion is well-known. But I am convinced that the White House needs to know that if it&#39;s only communicating with HRC, it&#39;s not communicating with the gay community. </p>
]]></html></oembed>