<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"?><oembed><version><![CDATA[1.0]]></version><provider_name><![CDATA[The Dish]]></provider_name><provider_url><![CDATA[http://dish.andrewsullivan.com]]></provider_url><author_name><![CDATA[Andrew Sullivan]]></author_name><author_url><![CDATA[https://dish.andrewsullivan.com/author/sullydish/]]></author_url><title><![CDATA[Ledeen On Lebanon]]></title><type><![CDATA[link]]></type><html><![CDATA[<p>A strange <a href="http://corner.nationalreview.com/post/?q=YzE2NTI5NGQ0YWE2M2JmYzAyNWU0NWM0ZjYxNjJjYjA=">reaction</a>. The good news:</p><div class="blockquote" style="margin-left: 40px;">The defeat of Hezbollah has regional significance. It will undoubtedly affect the Iranian &quot;elections,&quot; since one of Ahmadinejad&#39;s major claims has been that his tough line has produced success after success. The Lebanese have given him a spanking, and this will not be lost on the Iranians.<br /></div><p><br />But the bad news:</p><div class="blockquote" style="margin-left: 40px;">I cannot help thinking that the Lebanese learned something from Obama&#39;s Cairo speech (and Bush&#39;s second term), namely that they cannot rely on the United States to confront terrorists like Hezbollah. They, and others all over the area, are going to have to do a lot of their own fighting, and take their own chances, even though they know they cannot count on American support. <br /></div><p><br />But isn&#39;t a greater recognition among moderates in the region that they need to fight Islamist extremism a good thing? </p>]]></html></oembed>