<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"?><oembed><version><![CDATA[1.0]]></version><provider_name><![CDATA[The Dish]]></provider_name><provider_url><![CDATA[http://dish.andrewsullivan.com]]></provider_url><author_name><![CDATA[Andrew Sullivan]]></author_name><author_url><![CDATA[https://dish.andrewsullivan.com/author/sullydish/]]></author_url><title><![CDATA[Is Sotomayor&#8217;s Diabetes Fair&nbsp;Game?]]></title><type><![CDATA[link]]></type><html><![CDATA[<p><em>By Conor Clarke</em></p><p>When I saw this headline in my RSS reader -- &quot;<a href="http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/washington/2009/07/sotomayor-hearings-one-question-the-senators-did-not-ask-hows-her-health-.html">One question the senators did not ask: how&#39;s her health?</a>&quot; -- I assumed it was going to be a story about how those gosh-darn ungentlemanly career politicians failed to ask Sonia Sotomayor about her recently broken ankle. But it isn&#39;t. It&#39;s a story about how the senators failed to inquire after Sotomayor&#39;s diabetes, which she has had since the age of eight. And the article is not concerned with kindness, but miserly moral mathematics: because it is unlikely &quot;that Sotomayor will have the longevity of someone such as Justice John Paul Stevens,&quot; Sotomayor’s &quot;seat could more quickly be filled by a Republican than someone without a chronic illness.&quot;</p><p>Should they have asked about this? ]]></html></oembed>