<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"?><oembed><version><![CDATA[1.0]]></version><provider_name><![CDATA[The Dish]]></provider_name><provider_url><![CDATA[http://dish.andrewsullivan.com]]></provider_url><author_name><![CDATA[Andrew Sullivan]]></author_name><author_url><![CDATA[https://dish.andrewsullivan.com/author/sullydish/]]></author_url><title><![CDATA[Palin&#8217;s Brain Speaks,&nbsp;Ctd]]></title><type><![CDATA[link]]></type><html><![CDATA[
<p>Larison <a href="http://www.amconmag.com/larison/2009/11/20/a-sure-path-to-self-destruction/">counters</a> <a href="http://andrewsullivan.theatlantic.com/the_daily_dish/2009/11/mccains-struggle-for-reelection.html">Kristol</a>:</p>
<blockquote>
<p>Were [Palin] to side openly with McCain in a primary against Hayworth, whose views match up a lot more closely with her supporters’ views, she would be seen as imitating McCain’s worst habits. She would be considered a worse sell-out than McCain. She would be doing exactly the opposite of what she did in NY-23. Her intervention may have failed to elect Hoffman, but rank-and-file conservatives generally loved her for it anyway. She would fritter all that away if she backed McCain.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Is Kristol worrying that Steve Schmidt may be right about her? </p>
]]></html></oembed>