<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"?><oembed><version><![CDATA[1.0]]></version><provider_name><![CDATA[The Dish]]></provider_name><provider_url><![CDATA[http://dish.andrewsullivan.com]]></provider_url><author_name><![CDATA[Andrew Sullivan]]></author_name><author_url><![CDATA[https://dish.andrewsullivan.com/author/sullydish/]]></author_url><title><![CDATA[Shelby Steele&#8217;s Economic&nbsp;Arguments]]></title><type><![CDATA[link]]></type><html><![CDATA[
<p>Here <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748704254604574614540488450188.html?mod=rss_Today%27s_Most_Popular">they come:</a></p>
<blockquote>
<p>Hundreds of billions moving into trillions. Dramatic, history-making numbers. But where is the economic logic behind a stimulus package that doesn&#39;t fully click in for a number of years? How is every stimulus dollar spent actually going to stimulate? Why bailouts to institutions that only hoard the money? How is vast government spending simultaneously a kind of prudence that will not &quot;add to the deficit?&quot; How can such spending not trigger smothering levels of taxation?</p>
</blockquote>
<p>This by way of saying that Larry Summers, Tim Geithner, and Ben Bernanke know nothing about economics. </p>
]]></html></oembed>