<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"?><oembed><version><![CDATA[1.0]]></version><provider_name><![CDATA[The Dish]]></provider_name><provider_url><![CDATA[http://dish.andrewsullivan.com]]></provider_url><author_name><![CDATA[Andrew Sullivan]]></author_name><author_url><![CDATA[https://dish.andrewsullivan.com/author/sullydish/]]></author_url><title><![CDATA[System FAIL]]></title><type><![CDATA[link]]></type><html><![CDATA[
<p>Fallows has a <a href="http://jamesfallows.theatlantic.com/archives/2010/02/why_bipartisanship_cant_work.php#more">must-read</a> on the profound problems of the US constitutional system when the opposition party simply votes no on everything as a bloc. It&#39;s hard to come up with a better sense of the dynamic than this actual conversation that took place over the stimulus package:</p>
<blockquote>
<p>&quot;GOP member: &#39;I&#39;d like  this in the bill.&#39;</p>
<p> &quot;Dem member response: &#39;If we put it in, will you vote for the bill?&#39;</p>
<p>&quot;GOP member:&#0160; &#39;You know I can&#39;t vote for the bill.&#39;</p>
<p> &quot;Dem member:&#0160; &#39;Then why should we put it in the bill?&#39;</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Read the whole thing.</p>
]]></html></oembed>